EPYC 9475F vs EPYC 9684X
EPYC 9475F
EPYC 9684X
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9475F
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9684X
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9475F | EPYC 9684X |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($7,592) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($14,756) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Genoa-X (2023) / 5 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9475F | EPYC 9684X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+95%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($7,592) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($14,756) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9475F and EPYC 9684X
EPYC 9475F
The EPYC 9475F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.65 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 122,476 points. Launch price was $7,592.
EPYC 9684X
The EPYC 9684X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 1152 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 122,017 points. Launch price was $14,756.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9475F packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the EPYC 9684X offers 96 cores / 192 threads — the EPYC 9684X has 48 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9475F versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9684X — a 25.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 9475F (base: 3.65 GHz vs 2.55 GHz). The EPYC 9475F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9684X uses Genoa-X (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9475F scores 122,476 against the EPYC 9684X's 122,017 — a 0.4% lead for the EPYC 9475F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9475F vs 1152 MB (total) on the EPYC 9684X.
| Feature | EPYC 9475F | EPYC 9684X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96 | 96 / 192+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+30% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.65 GHz+43% | 2.55 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 1152 MB (total)+350% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Genoa-X (2023) |
| PassMark | 122,476 | 122,017 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,960 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 45,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The EPYC 9475F supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 199.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9475F) and SP5 (EPYC 9684X).
| Feature | EPYC 9475F | EPYC 9684X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 GB | 6 TB |
| RAM Channels | 12 | 12 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 9475F) vs AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9684X). Primary use case: EPYC 9475F targets Server, EPYC 9684X targets HPC / Cache Sensitive Workloads. Direct competitor: EPYC 9475F rivals Xeon 6952P; EPYC 9684X rivals Xeon 6979P.
| Feature | EPYC 9475F | EPYC 9684X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Server | HPC / Cache Sensitive Workloads |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9475F launched at $7592 MSRP, while the EPYC 9684X debuted at $14756. At current prices ($7592 vs $14756), the EPYC 9475F is $7164 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9475F delivers 16.1 pts/$ vs 8.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 9684X — making the EPYC 9475F the 64.4% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9475F | EPYC 9684X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7592-49% | $14756 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $7592-49% | $14756 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.1+94% | 8.3 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9475F and EPYC 9684X
