
EPYC 9555

EPYC 9654
EPYC 9555 vs EPYC 9654 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9555 vs EPYC 9654 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9555 vs EPYC 9654: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9555
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,979 less on MSRP ($9,826 MSRP vs $11,805 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 34.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.6 vs 10.1 PassMark/$ ($9,826 MSRP vs $11,805 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 384 MB).
EPYC 9654
2022Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9555 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (119,246 vs 133,253).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.1 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($11,805 MSRP vs $9,826 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9555 better than EPYC 9654?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9555 vs EPYC 9654 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9555
The EPYC 9555 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 133,253 points. Launch price was $9,826.

EPYC 9654
The EPYC 9654 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 119,246 points. Launch price was $11,805.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9555 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the EPYC 9654 offers 96 cores / 192 threads — the EPYC 9654 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9555 versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9654 — a 17.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9555 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 9555 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9654 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9555 scores 133,253 against the EPYC 9654's 119,246 — a 11.1% lead for the EPYC 9555. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9555 vs 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9654.
| Feature | EPYC 9555 | EPYC 9654 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128 | 96 / 192+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+19% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+33% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 384 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 133,253+12% | 119,246 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,250 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 20,000 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9555 versus DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9654 — the EPYC 9555 supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 6 TB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9555) and SP5 (EPYC 9654).
| Feature | EPYC 9555 | EPYC 9654 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000+25% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB | 6 TB |
| RAM Channels | 12 | 12 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9555 targets Data Center, EPYC 9654 targets Data Center. Direct competitor: EPYC 9555 rivals Xeon 6972P; EPYC 9654 rivals Xeon 8592+.
| Feature | EPYC 9555 | EPYC 9654 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Data Center | Data Center |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9555 was priced at $9826, while the EPYC 9654 came in at $11805. On launch pricing ($9826 vs $11805), EPYC 9555 was $1979 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9555 delivers 13.6 pts/$ vs 10.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 9654 — making the EPYC 9555 the 29.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9555 | EPYC 9654 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $9826-17% | $11805 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.6+35% | 10.1 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















