EPYC 9555 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

AMD

EPYC 9555

64 Cores128 Thrd360 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2024
EPYC family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

64 Cores128 Thrd350 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025
Threadripper Pro family
···

EPYC 9555 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9555 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9555 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9555

2024

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (133,253 vs 154,361).
    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 19.3 PassMark/$ ($9,826 MSRP vs $7,999 MSRP).

    Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

    2025

    Why buy it

    • Better for gaming: +14.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Costs $1,827 less on MSRP ($7,999 MSRP vs $9,826 MSRP).
    • Delivers 42.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.3 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($7,999 MSRP vs $9,826 MSRP).
    • Draws 350W instead of 360W, a 10W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX better than EPYC 9555?
    Yes. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 14.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 15.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX is the stronger fit. You are getting 15.8% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX is the better buy right now. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX comes in $1,827 cheaper on MSRP at $7,999 MSRP versus $9,826 MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 42.3% better value on MSRP (19.3 vs 13.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024), more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 128 threads instead of 64/128, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

    EPYC 9555 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    EPYC 9555

    The EPYC 9555 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 133,253 points. Launch price was $9,826.

    AMD

    Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

    The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 154,361 points. Launch price was $7,999.

    Processing Power

    Both the EPYC 9555 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX share an identical 64-core/128-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9555 versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX — a 20.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The EPYC 9555 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9555 scores 133,253 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX's 154,361 — a 14.7% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.

    FeatureEPYC 9555Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
    Cores / Threads
    64 / 128
    64 / 128
    Boost Clock
    4.4 GHz
    5.4 GHz+23%
    Base Clock
    3.2 GHz
    3.2 GHz
    L3 Cache
    256 MB (total)
    256 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    1 MB (per core)
    1 MB (per core)
    Process
    4 nm
    4 nm
    Architecture
    Turin (2024)
    Shimada Peak (2025)
    PassMark
    133,253
    154,361+16%
    Cinebench R23 Multi
    120,000
    Geekbench 6 Single
    3,644
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    37,967
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The EPYC 9555 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9555 versus DDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX supports 6.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9555 supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 2048 GB 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9555) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9555) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX).

    FeatureEPYC 9555Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
    Socket
    SP5
    sTR5
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 5.0+25%
    PCIe 4.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR5-6000
    DDR5-6400+7%
    Max RAM Capacity
    6 TB+200%
    2048 GB
    RAM Channels
    12+50%
    8
    ECC Support
    Yes
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    128
    128
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9555) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX). Primary use case: EPYC 9555 targets Data Center, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9555 rivals Xeon 6972P; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX rivals Xeon w9-3475X.

    FeatureEPYC 9555Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
    Integrated GPU
    No
    No
    AVX-512
    Yes
    Virtualization
    AMD-V, SEV-SNP
    true
    Target Use
    Data Center
    High-end Workstation
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the EPYC 9555 was priced at $9826, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX came in at $7999. On launch pricing ($9826 vs $7999), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX was $1827 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9555 delivers 13.6 pts/$ vs 19.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX the 34.9% better value option.

    FeatureEPYC 9555Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
    MSRP
    $9826
    $7999-19%
    Performance per Dollar
    13.6
    19.3+42%
    Release Date
    2024
    2025

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.