EPYC 9555 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9555 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9555 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9555

2024

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 18.1 PassMark/$ ($9,826 MSRP vs $7,349 MSRP).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,477 less on MSRP ($7,349 MSRP vs $9,826 MSRP).
✅Delivers 33.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.1 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($7,349 MSRP vs $9,826 MSRP).
✅Draws 350W instead of 360W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (133,149 vs 133,253).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX better than EPYC 9555?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is ahead with a 13.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9555 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9555 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is the better buy right now. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX comes in $2,477 cheaper on MSRP at $7,349 MSRP versus $9,826 MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 9555 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. It is also 33.6% better value on MSRP (18.1 vs 13.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9555 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023) and more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 128 threads instead of 64/128. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9555 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9555

The EPYC 9555 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 133,253 points. Launch price was $9,826.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 133,149 points. Launch price was $7,349.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 9555 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX share an identical 64-core/128-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9555 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The EPYC 9555 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9555 scores 133,253 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX's 133,149 — a 0.1% lead for the EPYC 9555. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	EPYC 9555	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
Cores / Threads	64 / 128	64 / 128
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	5.1 GHz+16%
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	256 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm-20%	5 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Storm Peak (2023)
PassMark	133,253	133,149
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	100,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,599
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	24,780

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9555 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9555 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX — the EPYC 9555 supports 15.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9555 supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9555) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9555) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX).

Feature	EPYC 9555	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
Socket	SP5	sTR5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000+15%	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+200%	2048 GB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9555) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX). Primary use case: EPYC 9555 targets Data Center, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9555 rivals Xeon 6972P; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX rivals Xeon w9-3475X.

Feature	EPYC 9555	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	true
Target Use	Data Center	High-end Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9555 was priced at $9826, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX came in at $7349. On launch pricing ($9826 vs $7349), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX was $2477 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9555 delivers 13.6 pts/$ vs 18.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX the 28.8% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9555	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
MSRP	$9826	$7349-25%
Performance per Dollar	13.6	18.1+33%
Release Date	2024	2023

Search EPYC 9555 on Amazon

Search Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.