EPYC 9565 vs EPYC 9654P

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9565

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $139 less on MSRP ($10,486 MSRP vs $10,625 MSRP).
✅Delivers 17.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.9 vs 10.9 PassMark/$ ($10,486 MSRP vs $10,625 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

EPYC 9654P

2022

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (116,324 vs 135,221).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.9 vs 12.9 PassMark/$ ($10,625 MSRP vs $10,486 MSRP).

EPYC 9565

2024

EPYC 9654P

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $139 less on MSRP ($10,486 MSRP vs $10,625 MSRP).
✅Delivers 17.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.9 vs 10.9 PassMark/$ ($10,486 MSRP vs $10,625 MSRP).

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (116,324 vs 135,221).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.9 vs 12.9 PassMark/$ ($10,625 MSRP vs $10,486 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9565 better than EPYC 9654P?

Yes. EPYC 9565 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 16.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9565 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 1.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9565 is the better fit. You are getting 16.2% better PassMark, backed by 72 cores and 144 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9565 is the smarter buy today. EPYC 9565 is $139 cheaper on MSRP at $10,486 MSRP versus $10,625 MSRP, and it gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 17.8% better value on MSRP (12.9 vs 10.9 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9565 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 72 cores / 144 threads instead of 96/192. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9565 Benchmark Check

EPYC 9654P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9565	EPYC 9654P
1080p
low	171 FPS	170 FPS
medium	142 FPS	141 FPS
high	121 FPS	122 FPS
ultra	98 FPS	96 FPS
1440p
low	150 FPS	148 FPS
medium	120 FPS	119 FPS
high	98 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	81 FPS	77 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	70 FPS
medium	69 FPS	59 FPS
high	55 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	39 FPS

Open EPYC 9565 Open EPYC 9654P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9565	EPYC 9654P
1080p
low	583 FPS	524 FPS
medium	511 FPS	457 FPS
high	415 FPS	365 FPS
ultra	361 FPS	296 FPS
1440p
low	492 FPS	431 FPS
medium	439 FPS	385 FPS
high	367 FPS	317 FPS
ultra	302 FPS	250 FPS
4K
low	306 FPS	265 FPS
medium	276 FPS	241 FPS
high	249 FPS	211 FPS
ultra	222 FPS	176 FPS

Open EPYC 9565 Open EPYC 9654P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9565	EPYC 9654P
1080p
low	747 FPS	671 FPS
medium	634 FPS	560 FPS
high	575 FPS	522 FPS
ultra	506 FPS	454 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	511 FPS
medium	474 FPS	425 FPS
high	423 FPS	389 FPS
ultra	366 FPS	337 FPS
4K
low	405 FPS	376 FPS
medium	324 FPS	293 FPS
high	286 FPS	262 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	210 FPS

Open EPYC 9565 Open EPYC 9654P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9565	EPYC 9654P
1080p
low	969 FPS	902 FPS
medium	875 FPS	822 FPS
high	752 FPS	708 FPS
ultra	676 FPS	623 FPS
1440p
low	780 FPS	724 FPS
medium	683 FPS	631 FPS
high	583 FPS	540 FPS
ultra	513 FPS	461 FPS
4K
low	551 FPS	519 FPS
medium	496 FPS	464 FPS
high	434 FPS	407 FPS
ultra	380 FPS	350 FPS

Open EPYC 9565 Open EPYC 9654P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9565 and EPYC 9654P

EPYC 9565

The EPYC 9565 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 72 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 3.15 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 135,221 points. Launch price was $10,486.

EPYC 9654P

The EPYC 9654P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 116,324 points. Launch price was $10,625.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9565 packs 72 cores / 144 threads, while the EPYC 9654P offers 96 cores / 192 threads — the EPYC 9654P has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9565 versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9654P — a 15% clock advantage for the EPYC 9565 (base: 3.15 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 9565 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9654P uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9565 scores 135,221 against the EPYC 9654P's 116,324 — a 15% lead for the EPYC 9565. Both processors carry 384 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	EPYC 9565	EPYC 9654P
Cores / Threads	72 / 144	96 / 192+33%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+16%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.15 GHz+31%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	384 MB (total)	384 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm-20%	5 nm, 6 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Genoa (2022−2023)
PassMark	135,221+16%	116,324
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,025
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	23,214

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. Both support up to 6 TB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9565) and SP5 (EPYC 9654P).

Feature	EPYC 9565	EPYC 9654P
Socket	SP5	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB	6 TB
RAM Channels	12	12
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9565 targets Data Center / Cloud Computing, EPYC 9654P targets Data Center / Single Socket. Direct competitor: EPYC 9565 rivals Xeon 6972P; EPYC 9654P rivals Xeon 8490H.

Feature	EPYC 9565	EPYC 9654P
Integrated GPU	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use	Data Center / Cloud Computing	Data Center / Single Socket

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9565 launched at $10486 MSRP, while the EPYC 9654P debuted at $10625. On MSRP ($10486 vs $10625), the EPYC 9565 is $139 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9565 delivers 12.9 pts/$ vs 10.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 9654P — making the EPYC 9565 the 16.3% better value option.