EPYC 9565 vs EPYC 9845

AMD

EPYC 9565

72 Cores144 Thrd400 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2024
EPYC family
·······
VS
AMD

EPYC 9845

160 Cores320 Thrd390 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2024
EPYC family
·······

EPYC 9565 vs EPYC 9845 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9565 vs EPYC 9845 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9565 vs EPYC 9845: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9565

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +15.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +20% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 320 MB).
  • Costs $3,078 less on MSRP ($10,486 MSRP vs $13,564 MSRP).
  • Delivers 14.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.9 vs 11.3 PassMark/$ ($10,486 MSRP vs $13,564 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (135,221 vs 152,985).

EPYC 9845

2024

Why buy it

  • +13.1% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 390W instead of 400W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9565 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (320 MB vs 384 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.3 vs 12.9 PassMark/$ ($13,564 MSRP vs $10,486 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9845 better than EPYC 9565?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9565 is ahead with a 15.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9845 pulls ahead with 13.1% better PassMark. EPYC 9565 also has the bigger cache pool with 20% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 320 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9845 is the stronger fit. You are getting 13.1% better PassMark, backed by 160 cores and 320 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 9845 is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 9565 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 9845 comes in 29.4% more expensive on MSRP at $13,564 MSRP versus $10,486 MSRP, and it still gives you 13.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that EPYC 9565 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 15.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 9565 is also 14.3% better value on MSRP (12.9 vs 11.3 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9845 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 160 cores / 320 threads instead of 72/144. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 9565 vs EPYC 9845 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 9565

The EPYC 9565 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 72 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 3.15 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 135,221 points. Launch price was $10,486.

AMD

EPYC 9845

The EPYC 9845 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 160 cores and 320 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 320 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 390 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 152,985 points. Launch price was $13,564.

Processing Power

The EPYC 9565 packs 72 cores / 144 threads, while the EPYC 9845 offers 160 cores / 320 threads — the EPYC 9845 has 88 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9565 versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9845 — a 15% clock advantage for the EPYC 9565 (base: 3.15 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). Both are built on the Turin (2024) architecture using a 4 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 9565 scores 135,221 against the EPYC 9845's 152,985 — a 12.3% lead for the EPYC 9845. L3 cache: 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9565 vs 320 MB (total) on the EPYC 9845.

FeatureEPYC 9565EPYC 9845
Cores / Threads
72 / 144
160 / 320+122%
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz+16%
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
3.15 GHz+50%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
384 MB (total)+20%
320 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
4 nm
3 nm-25%
Architecture
Turin (2024)
Turin (2024)
PassMark
135,221
152,985+13%
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. Both support up to 6 TB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9565) and SP5 (EPYC 9845).

FeatureEPYC 9565EPYC 9845
Socket
SP5
SP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6000
DDR5-6000
Max RAM Capacity
6 TB
6 TB
RAM Channels
12
12
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9565 targets Data Center / Cloud Computing, EPYC 9845 targets Data Center / AI Training. Direct competitor: EPYC 9565 rivals Xeon 6972P; EPYC 9845 rivals Xeon 6972P.

FeatureEPYC 9565EPYC 9845
Integrated GPU
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use
Data Center / Cloud Computing
Data Center / AI Training
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9565 was priced at $10486, while the EPYC 9845 came in at $13564. On launch pricing ($10486 vs $13564), EPYC 9565 was $3078 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9565 delivers 12.9 pts/$ vs 11.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 9845 — making the EPYC 9565 the 13.4% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9565EPYC 9845
MSRP
$10486-23%
$13564
Performance per Dollar
12.9+14%
11.3
Release Date
2024
2024

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.