Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

EPYC 9565 vs EPYC 9684X

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

EPYC 9565

72 Cores144 Thrd400 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2024
EPYC family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

EPYC 9684X

96 Cores192 Thrd400 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2023
EPYC family
·······
Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9565 vs EPYC 9684X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9565
72 / 144
135,221
+10.8%
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7970X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9970X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9980X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
EPYC 9684X
96 / 192
122,017
0.0%
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9970X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7980X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9980X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9565 vs EPYC 9684X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
EPYC 9565
low171 FPS
medium142 FPS
high121 FPS
ultra98 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9684X
low169 FPS
medium140 FPS
high120 FPS
ultra94 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
EPYC 9565
low583 FPS
medium511 FPS
high415 FPS
ultra361 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9684X
low506 FPS
medium442 FPS
high353 FPS
ultra287 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
EPYC 9565
low747 FPS
medium634 FPS
high575 FPS
ultra506 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9684X
low668 FPS
medium558 FPS
high519 FPS
ultra452 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
EPYC 9565
low969 FPS
medium875 FPS
high752 FPS
ultra676 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9684X
low902 FPS
medium822 FPS
high708 FPS
ultra623 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
EPYC 9565
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9684X
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
EPYC 9565
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9684X
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
EPYC 9565
low300 FPS
medium229 FPS
high207 FPS
ultra186 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9684X
low300 FPS
medium229 FPS
high207 FPS
ultra186 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
EPYC 9565
low257 FPS
medium228 FPS
high180 FPS
ultra146 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9684X
low252 FPS
medium223 FPS
high175 FPS
ultra142 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
EPYC 9565
low323 FPS
medium289 FPS
high268 FPS
ultra231 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9684X
low316 FPS
medium284 FPS
high263 FPS
ultra221 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
EPYC 9565
low280 FPS
medium261 FPS
high220 FPS
ultra207 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9684X
low234 FPS
medium206 FPS
high173 FPS
ultra161 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

EPYC 9565 vs EPYC 9684X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9565

2024

Why buy it

  • ✅Better for gaming: +10.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ✅Costs $4,270 less on MSRP ($10,486 MSRP vs $14,756 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 55.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.9 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($10,486 MSRP vs $14,756 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (384 MB vs 1.1 GB).

EPYC 9684X

2023

Why buy it

  • ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (1.1 GB vs 384 MB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9565 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower PassMark (122,017 vs 135,221).
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 12.9 PassMark/$ ($14,756 MSRP vs $10,486 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9565 better than EPYC 9684X?
Yes. EPYC 9565 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 10.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 10.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9565 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9565 is the stronger fit. You are getting 10.8% better PassMark, backed by 72 cores and 144 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 9565 is the better buy right now. EPYC 9565 comes in $4,270 cheaper on MSRP at $10,486 MSRP versus $14,756 MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 55.9% better value on MSRP (12.9 vs 8.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9565 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023) and more multi-core headroom with 72 cores / 144 threads instead of 96/192. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9565 vs EPYC 9684X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 9565

The EPYC 9565 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 72 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 3.15 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 135,221 points. Launch price was $10,486.

AMD

EPYC 9684X

The EPYC 9684X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 1152 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 122,017 points. Launch price was $14,756.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9565 packs 72 cores / 144 threads, while the EPYC 9684X offers 96 cores / 192 threads — the EPYC 9684X has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9565 versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9684X — a 15% clock advantage for the EPYC 9565 (base: 3.15 GHz vs 2.55 GHz). The EPYC 9565 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9684X uses Genoa-X (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9565 scores 135,221 against the EPYC 9684X's 122,017 — a 10.3% lead for the EPYC 9565. L3 cache: 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9565 vs 1152 MB (total) on the EPYC 9684X.

FeatureEPYC 9565EPYC 9684X
Cores / Threads
72 / 144
96 / 192+33%
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz+16%
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
3.15 GHz+24%
2.55 GHz
L3 Cache
384 MB (total)
1152 MB (total)+200%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
4 nm-20%
5 nm
Architecture
Turin (2024)
Genoa-X (2023)
PassMark
135,221+11%
122,017
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9565 versus DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9684X — the EPYC 9565 supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 6 TB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9565) and SP5 (EPYC 9684X).

FeatureEPYC 9565EPYC 9684X
Socket
SP5
SP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6000+25%
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
6 TB
6 TB
RAM Channels
12
12
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9565 targets Data Center / Cloud Computing, EPYC 9684X targets HPC / Cache Sensitive Workloads. Direct competitor: EPYC 9565 rivals Xeon 6972P; EPYC 9684X rivals Xeon 6979P.

FeatureEPYC 9565EPYC 9684X
Integrated GPU
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use
Data Center / Cloud Computing
HPC / Cache Sensitive Workloads
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9565 was priced at $10486, while the EPYC 9684X came in at $14756. On launch pricing ($10486 vs $14756), EPYC 9565 was $4270 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9565 delivers 12.9 pts/$ vs 8.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 9684X — making the EPYC 9565 the 43.7% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9565EPYC 9684X
MSRP
$10486-29%
$14756
Performance per Dollar
12.9+55%
8.3
Release Date
2024
2023
Search EPYC 9565 on AmazonSearch EPYC 9684X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.