Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

EPYC 9655 vs EPYC 9755

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

EPYC 9655

96 Cores192 Thrd400 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2024
EPYC family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

EPYC 9755

128 Cores256 Thrd500 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2024
EPYC family
·······
Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9655 vs EPYC 9755 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9655
96 / 192
156,110
0.0%
brand logoRyzen 7 7700X
brand logoRyzen 9 9850HX
brand logoRyzen 9 9950X3D
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7970X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9970X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7980X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
EPYC 9755
128 / 256
166,328
+6.5%
brand logoRyzen 7 9700X
brand logoRyzen 9 9900X3D
brand logoRyzen 9 9950X3D
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9970X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9655 vs EPYC 9755 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
EPYC 9655
low170 FPS
medium143 FPS
high122 FPS
ultra99 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9755
low170 FPS
medium141 FPS
high120 FPS
ultra95 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
EPYC 9655
low696 FPS
medium602 FPS
high475 FPS
ultra411 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9755
low581 FPS
medium510 FPS
high414 FPS
ultra361 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
EPYC 9655
low746 FPS
medium633 FPS
high589 FPS
ultra519 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9755
low741 FPS
medium632 FPS
high574 FPS
ultra505 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
EPYC 9655
low1047 FPS
medium939 FPS
high821 FPS
ultra744 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9755
low915 FPS
medium830 FPS
high715 FPS
ultra632 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
EPYC 9655
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9755
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
EPYC 9655
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9755
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
EPYC 9655
low300 FPS
medium229 FPS
high207 FPS
ultra186 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9755
low300 FPS
medium229 FPS
high207 FPS
ultra186 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
EPYC 9655
low257 FPS
medium228 FPS
high180 FPS
ultra147 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9755
low255 FPS
medium225 FPS
high178 FPS
ultra144 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
EPYC 9655
low322 FPS
medium289 FPS
high268 FPS
ultra231 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9755
low322 FPS
medium289 FPS
high268 FPS
ultra231 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
EPYC 9655
low277 FPS
medium258 FPS
high217 FPS
ultra205 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9755
low277 FPS
medium258 FPS
high217 FPS
ultra205 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

EPYC 9655 vs EPYC 9755: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9655

2024

Why buy it

  • ✅Better for gaming: +10.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ✅Costs $1,132 less on MSRP ($11,852 MSRP vs $12,984 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 400W instead of 500W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (384 MB vs 512 MB).

EPYC 9755

2024

Why buy it

  • ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 384 MB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9655 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (29,300 vs 29,329).
  • ❌
    9.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $12,984 MSRPvs$11,852 MSRP
  • ❌25% higher power demand at 500W vs 400W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9655 better than EPYC 9755?
Yes. EPYC 9655 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 10.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better Geekbench multi-core, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9655 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9655 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 96 cores and 192 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 9655 is the better buy right now. EPYC 9655 comes in $1,132 cheaper on MSRP at $11,852 MSRP versus $12,984 MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 2.8% better value on MSRP (13.2 vs 12.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9655 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 96 cores / 192 threads instead of 128/256 and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 9655 vs EPYC 9755 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 9655

The EPYC 9655 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 156,110 points. Launch price was $11,852.

AMD

EPYC 9755

The EPYC 9755 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 128 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 512 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 500 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 166,328 points. Launch price was $12,984.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9655 packs 96 cores / 192 threads, while the EPYC 9755 offers 128 cores / 256 threads — the EPYC 9755 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the EPYC 9655 versus 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9755 — a 9.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9655 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). Both are built on the Turin (2024) architecture using a 4 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 9655 scores 156,110 against the EPYC 9755's 166,328 — a 6.3% lead for the EPYC 9755. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,830 vs 2,800, a 1.1% lead for the EPYC 9655 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,329 vs 29,300 (0.1% advantage for the EPYC 9655). L3 cache: 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9655 vs 512 MB (total) on the EPYC 9755.

FeatureEPYC 9655EPYC 9755
Cores / Threads
96 / 192
128 / 256+33%
Boost Clock
4.5 GHz+10%
4.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
2.7 GHz+4%
L3 Cache
384 MB (total)
512 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
4 nm
4 nm
Architecture
Turin (2024)
Turin (2024)
PassMark
156,110
166,328+7%
Geekbench 6 Single
2,830+1%
2,800
Geekbench 6 Multi
29,329
29,300
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. Both support up to 9 TB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9655) and SP5 (EPYC 9755).

FeatureEPYC 9655EPYC 9755
Socket
SP5
SP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6000
DDR5-6000
Max RAM Capacity
9 TB
9 TB
RAM Channels
12
12
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9655 targets Data Center, EPYC 9755 targets Data Center / Cloud Computing. Direct competitor: EPYC 9655 rivals Xeon 6979P; EPYC 9755 rivals Xeon 6980P.

FeatureEPYC 9655EPYC 9755
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
—
AVX-512
Yes
—
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use
Data Center
Data Center / Cloud Computing
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9655 was priced at $11852, while the EPYC 9755 came in at $12984. On launch pricing ($11852 vs $12984), EPYC 9655 was $1132 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9655 delivers 13.2 pts/$ vs 12.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 9755 — making the EPYC 9655 the 2.8% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9655EPYC 9755
MSRP
$11852-9%
$12984
Performance per Dollar
13.2+3%
12.8
Release Date
2024
2024
Search EPYC 9655 on AmazonSearch EPYC 9755 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.