FirePro 3D V3700 vs GeForce 8600 GTS
FirePro 3D V3700
Popular choices:
GeForce 8600 GTS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro 3D V3700 is positioned at rank 303 and the GeForce 8600 GTS is on rank 698, so the FirePro 3D V3700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V3700
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8600 GTS
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The FirePro 3D V3700 is significantly newer (2014 vs 2008). The FirePro 3D V3700 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 8600 GTS lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 8600 GTS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro 3D V3700.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V3700 | GeForce 8600 GTS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro 3D V3700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro 3D V3700 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $35), it costs 71% less, resulting in a 238.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V3700 | GeForce 8600 GTS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+238.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($35) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V3700 and GeForce 8600 GTS
FirePro 3D V3700
The FirePro 3D V3700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 179 points.
GeForce 8600 GTS
The GeForce 8600 GTS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 185 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V3700 scores 179 and the GeForce 8600 GTS reaches 185 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V3700 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 8600 GTS uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V3700) vs 224 (GeForce 8600 GTS).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3700 | GeForce 8600 GTS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 179 | 185+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | G9x |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+814% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3700 | GeForce 8600 GTS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V3700 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8600 GTS has 512 MB. The GeForce 8600 GTS offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3700 | GeForce 8600 GTS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 3D V3700) vs 10.0 (GeForce 8600 GTS). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3700 | GeForce 8600 GTS |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD (FirePro 3D V3700) vs No (GeForce 8600 GTS). Decoder: UVD vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V3700) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8600 GTS).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3700 | GeForce 8600 GTS |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD | No |
| Decoder | UVD | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V3700 draws 274W versus the GeForce 8600 GTS's 150W — a 58.5% difference. The GeForce 8600 GTS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V3700) vs 350W (GeForce 8600 GTS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 198mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3700 | GeForce 8600 GTS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 150W-45% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 198mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-24% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7 | 1.2+71% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro 3D V3700 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GeForce 8600 GTS launched at $199 and now averages $35. The FirePro 3D V3700 costs 71.4% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.9 (FirePro 3D V3700) vs 5.3 (GeForce 8600 GTS) — the FirePro 3D V3700 offers 237.7% better value. The FirePro 3D V3700 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2008).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3700 | GeForce 8600 GTS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-50% | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-71% | $35 |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.9+238% | 5.3 |
| Codename | Tahiti | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | January 18 2014 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #423 | #825 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro 3D V3700 and GeForce 8600 GTS
