FirePro 3D V3700 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

FirePro 3D V3700

2014Core: 850 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz
RTX family
·······

FirePro 3D V3700 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 3D V3700 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 3D V3700

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $70 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (179 vs 10,749).
  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • 2014 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.8 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

  • +5905% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Delivers 3417.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 1.8 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 256 MB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 5905% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 179), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 256 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, and 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $70 more expensive on MSRP at $169 vs $99, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3417.7% (63.6 vs 1.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

FirePro 3D V3700 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro 3D V3700

The FirePro 3D V3700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 179 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro 3D V3700 scores 179 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 5905%. The FirePro 3D V3700 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V3700) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V3700) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).

FeatureFirePro 3D V3700GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
G3D Mark Score
179
10,749+5905%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Ampere
Process Node
28 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
2048
2304+13%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.482 TFLOPS
6.774 TFLOPS+95%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
128+78%
72
L1 Cache
0.5 MB
2.3 MB+360%
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
2 MB+167%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro 3D V3700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro 3D V3700GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 3D V3700 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 2300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V3700 and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro 3D V3700) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro 3D V3700GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
6 GB+2300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
64-bit
96-bit+50%
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
2 MB+167%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 3D V3700) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro 3D V3700GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
DirectX
10.1
12 Ultimate+19%
Vulkan
None
1.3
OpenGL
3.3
4.6+39%
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD (FirePro 3D V3700) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: UVD vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V3700) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).

FeatureFirePro 3D V3700GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Encoder
UVD
NVENC (5th Gen)
Decoder
UVD
NVDEC (7th Gen)
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V3700 draws 274W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 118.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V3700) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 168mm vs 160mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 75°C.

FeatureFirePro 3D V3700GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
TDP
274W
70W-74%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
168mm
160mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
65°C-13%
75°C
Perf/Watt
0.7
153.6+21843%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 3D V3700 came in at $99, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. On MSRP, FirePro 3D V3700 was 41.4% cheaper ($70 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.8 (FirePro 3D V3700) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 3433.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro 3D V3700GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP
$99-41%
$169
Performance per Dollar
1.8
63.6+3433%
Codename
Tahiti
GA107
Release
January 18 2014
February 2 2024
Ranking
#423
#252

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.