
FirePro 3D V3700

Radeon HDG 4670
FirePro 3D V3700 vs Radeon HDG 4670 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro 3D V3700 vs Radeon HDG 4670 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro 3D V3700 vs Radeon HDG 4670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro 3D V3700
2014Why buy it
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 193mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌47.8% HIGHER MSRP$99 MSRPvs$67 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.8 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $67 MSRP).
Radeon HDG 4670
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $32 less on MSRP ($67 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 40.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.5 vs 1.8 G3D/$ ($67 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌14.9% longer card at 193mm vs 168mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 3D V3700 vs Radeon HDG 4670 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 3D V3700
The FirePro 3D V3700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 179 points.

Radeon HDG 4670
The Radeon HDG 4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points. Launch price was $369.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro 3D V3700 scores 179 versus the Radeon HDG 4670's 170 — the FirePro 3D V3700 leads by 5.3%. The FirePro 3D V3700 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HDG 4670 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V3700) vs 1,536 (Radeon HDG 4670). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V3700) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HDG 4670).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3700 | Radeon HDG 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 179+5% | 170 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+33% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.482 TFLOPS+29% | 2.703 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+33% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+167% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3700 | Radeon HDG 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V3700 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HDG 4670 carries 512 MB. Radeon HDG 4670 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V3700 and 128-bit on the Radeon HDG 4670. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro 3D V3700) vs 512 KB (Radeon HDG 4670) — the FirePro 3D V3700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3700 | Radeon HDG 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 3D V3700) vs 10.1 (Radeon HDG 4670). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3700 | Radeon HDG 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD (FirePro 3D V3700) vs UVD 2 (Radeon HDG 4670). Decoder: UVD vs UVD 2.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3700 | Radeon HDG 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD | UVD 2 |
| Decoder | UVD | UVD 2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V3700 draws 274W versus the Radeon HDG 4670's 250W — a 9.2% difference. The Radeon HDG 4670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V3700) vs 350W (Radeon HDG 4670). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 193mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3700 | Radeon HDG 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 250W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 193mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7 | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro 3D V3700 came in at $99, while the Radeon HDG 4670 launched at $67. On MSRP, Radeon HDG 4670 was 32.3% cheaper ($32 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.8 (FirePro 3D V3700) vs 2.5 (Radeon HDG 4670) — the Radeon HDG 4670 offers 38.9% better value. The newer card here is FirePro 3D V3700 (2014 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3700 | Radeon HDG 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99 | $67-32% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.8 | 2.5+39% |
| Codename | Tahiti | Cayman |
| Release | January 18 2014 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #423 | #596 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














