
FirePro 3D V3700
Popular choices:

Radeon HDG 4670
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro 3D V3700
2014Why buy it
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 193mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌47.8% HIGHER MSRP$99 MSRPvs$67 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.8 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $67 MSRP).
Radeon HDG 4670
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $32 less on MSRP ($67 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 40.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.5 vs 1.8 G3D/$ ($67 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌14.9% longer card at 193mm vs 168mm.
FirePro 3D V3700
2014Radeon HDG 4670
2010Why buy it
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 193mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $32 less on MSRP ($67 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 40.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.5 vs 1.8 G3D/$ ($67 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌47.8% HIGHER MSRP$99 MSRPvs$67 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.8 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $67 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌14.9% longer card at 193mm vs 168mm.
Quick Answers
So, is FirePro 3D V3700 better than Radeon HDG 4670?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HDG 4670 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro 3D V3700 | Radeon HDG 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 8 FPS | 8 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro 3D V3700 | Radeon HDG 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 8 FPS | 8 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro 3D V3700 | Radeon HDG 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 8 FPS | 8 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro 3D V3700 | Radeon HDG 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 8 FPS | 8 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V3700 and Radeon HDG 4670

FirePro 3D V3700
FirePro 3D V3700
The FirePro 3D V3700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 179 points.

Radeon HDG 4670
Radeon HDG 4670
The Radeon HDG 4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points. Launch price was $369.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro 3D V3700 scores 179 versus the Radeon HDG 4670's 170 — the FirePro 3D V3700 leads by 5.3%. The FirePro 3D V3700 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HDG 4670 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V3700) vs 1,536 (Radeon HDG 4670). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V3700) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HDG 4670).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3700 | Radeon HDG 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 179+5% | 170 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+33% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.482 TFLOPS+29% | 2.703 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+33% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+167% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3700 | Radeon HDG 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V3700 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HDG 4670 has 512 MB. The Radeon HDG 4670 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro 3D V3700) vs 512 KB (Radeon HDG 4670) — the FirePro 3D V3700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3700 | Radeon HDG 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 3D V3700) vs 10.1 (Radeon HDG 4670). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3700 | Radeon HDG 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD (FirePro 3D V3700) vs UVD 2 (Radeon HDG 4670). Decoder: UVD vs UVD 2.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3700 | Radeon HDG 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD | UVD 2 |
| Decoder | UVD | UVD 2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V3700 draws 274W versus the Radeon HDG 4670's 250W — a 9.2% difference. The Radeon HDG 4670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V3700) vs 350W (Radeon HDG 4670). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 193mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3700 | Radeon HDG 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 250W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 193mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7 | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro 3D V3700 launched at $99 MSRP, while the Radeon HDG 4670 launched at $67. The Radeon HDG 4670 costs 32.3% less ($32 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.8 (FirePro 3D V3700) vs 2.5 (Radeon HDG 4670) — the Radeon HDG 4670 offers 38.9% better value. The FirePro 3D V3700 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3700 | Radeon HDG 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99 | $67-32% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.8 | 2.5+39% |
| Codename | Tahiti | Cayman |
| Release | January 18 2014 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #423 | #596 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












