FX-4100 vs Core i3-3250T
FX-4100
Core i3-3250T
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-4100 is positioned at rank 728 and the Core i3-3250T is on rank 811, so the FX-4100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FX-4100
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3250T
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | FX-4100 | Core i3-3250T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | FX-4100 | Core i3-3250T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+34%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FX-4100 and Core i3-3250T
FX-4100
The FX-4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,630 points. Launch price was $69.
Core i3-3250T
The Core i3-3250T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,650 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The FX-4100 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-3250T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the FX-4100 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the FX-4100 versus 3 GHz on the Core i3-3250T — a 23.5% clock advantage for the FX-4100 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3 GHz). The FX-4100 uses the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-3250T uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the FX-4100 scores 2,630 against the Core i3-3250T's 2,650 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i3-3250T. L3 cache: 8192 kB on the FX-4100 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3250T.
| Feature | FX-4100 | Core i3-3250T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+27% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+20% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8192 kB+167% | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB+1500% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 22 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Zambezi (2011−2012) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 2,630 | 2,650 |
Memory & Platform
The FX-4100 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-3250T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | FX-4100 | Core i3-3250T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3+ | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
The Core i3-3250T includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 2500), while the FX-4100 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | FX-4100 | Core i3-3250T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics 2500 |
Value Analysis
The FX-4100 launched at $115 MSRP, while the Core i3-3250T debuted at $138. At current prices ($20 vs $15), the Core i3-3250T is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-4100 delivers 131.5 pts/$ vs 176.7 pts/$ for the Core i3-3250T — making the Core i3-3250T the 29.3% better value option.
| Feature | FX-4100 | Core i3-3250T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $115-17% | $138 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $15-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 131.5 | 176.7+34% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on FX-4100 and Core i3-3250T
