FX-4100
VS
Core i7-3687U

FX-4100 vs Core i7-3687U

AMD

FX-4100

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core i7-3687U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-4100 is positioned at rank 728 and the Core i7-3687U is on rank 654, so the Core i7-3687U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FX-4100

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
13630%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12879%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9351%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2817%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2231%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1952%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1118%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1103%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1005%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1005%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
993%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
967%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
953%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
949%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
941%
#728
FX-4100
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
100%
#729
Core i5-7440EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $30
100%
#730
Core i5-3350P
MSRP: $189|Avg: $25
100%
#732
Core i3-4350T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $20
100%
#733
Athlon II X4 641
MSRP: $102|Avg: $102
99%
#734
Athlon II X3 460
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
99%
#735
Pentium G2100T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $10
99%
#736
Core i5-3330
MSRP: $182|Avg: $21
99%
#737
Core i3-4330T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
98%
#738
Pentium E5300
MSRP: $62|Avg: $25
98%
#739
Athlon II X2 215
MSRP: $45|Avg: $10
98%
#740
Core i7-4790S
MSRP: $312|Avg: $60
98%
#741
Pentium G2020T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $69
98%
#742
FX-6100
MSRP: $165|Avg: $25
98%
#743
Core i7-4771
MSRP: $320|Avg: $78
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3687U

#642
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
896%
#643
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
882%
#644
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
810%
#645
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
806%
#646
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
799%
#648
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
772%
#649
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
740%
#650
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
739%
#651
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
719%
#654
Core i7-3687U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#662
Athlon II P360
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
99%
#665
Athlon X2 QL-64
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#666
Core 3 N350
MSRP: $225|Avg: $220
98%
#668
FX-7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The FX-4100 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i7-3687U in both compute-intensive tasks (0.3% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightFX-4100Core i7-3687U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightFX-4100Core i7-3687U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FX-4100 and Core i7-3687U

AMD

FX-4100

The FX-4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,630 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i7-3687U

The Core i7-3687U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,621 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The FX-4100 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-3687U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the FX-4100 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the FX-4100 versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-3687U — a 14.1% clock advantage for the FX-4100 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The FX-4100 uses the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-3687U uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the FX-4100 scores 2,630 against the Core i7-3687U's 2,621 — a 0.3% lead for the FX-4100. L3 cache: 8192 kB on the FX-4100 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-3687U.

FeatureFX-4100Core i7-3687U
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+15%
3.3 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+71%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
8192 kB+100%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4096 kB+1500%
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Zambezi (2011−2012)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,630
2,621
Geekbench 6 Single
640
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,240
🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-4100 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-3687U uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureFX-4100Core i7-3687U
Socket
AM3+
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (FX-4100) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-3687U). The Core i7-3687U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the FX-4100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3687U targets Enthusiast. Direct competitor: Core i7-3687U rivals Ryzen 7 3700U.

FeatureFX-4100Core i7-3687U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Enthusiast