
Radeon Pro WX 4130 vs Radeon RX 5700

Radeon Pro WX 4130
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is positioned at rank #186 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 4130
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 5700 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX 5700 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 5700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 656.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro WX 4130.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-656.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+656.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (270mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 5700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $250 (vs $100), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 202.6% better value per dollar than the Radeon Pro WX 4130.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+202.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($100) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 4130 and Radeon RX 5700

Radeon Pro WX 4130
The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,890 points.

Radeon RX 5700
The Radeon RX 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,296 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro WX 4130 scores 1,890 versus the Radeon RX 5700's 14,296 — the Radeon RX 5700 leads by 656.4%. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon Pro WX 4130) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700). Raw compute: 1.348 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4130) vs 7.949 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700). Boost clocks: 1053 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,890 | 14,296+656% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 2304+260% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.348 TFLOPS | 7.949 TFLOPS+490% |
| Boost Clock | 1053 MHz | 1725 MHz+64% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 40 | 144+260% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 4130 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5700 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 5700 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4130) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 5700) — the Radeon RX 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4130) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 5700). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 4130) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 4130) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 4130 draws 50W versus the Radeon RX 5700's 180W — a 113% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4130) vs 600W (Radeon RX 5700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-72% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-42% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | — | 270mm |
| Height | — | 110mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 37.8 | 79.4+110% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 4130 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Radeon RX 5700 launched at $379 and now averages $250. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 costs 60% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 18.9 (Radeon Pro WX 4130) vs 57.2 (Radeon RX 5700) — the Radeon RX 5700 offers 202.6% better value. The Radeon RX 5700 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-21% | $379 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-60% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.9 | 57.2+203% |
| Codename | Baffin | Navi 10 |
| Release | March 1 2017 | July 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #697 | #167 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













