Radeon Pro WX 4130 vs Moore Threads MTT S70
Radeon Pro WX 4130
Popular choices:
Moore Threads MTT S70
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is positioned at rank #186 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 4130
Performance Per Dollar Moore Threads MTT S70
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is significantly newer (2017 vs 0). The Radeon Pro WX 4130 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Moore Threads MTT S70 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Moore Threads MTT S70.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | MUSA (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro WX 4130 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $100 versus $140 for the Moore Threads MTT S70, it costs 29% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 40.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+40.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($100) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($140) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 4130 and Moore Threads MTT S70
Radeon Pro WX 4130
The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,890 points.
Moore Threads MTT S70
The Moore Threads MTT S70 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1600 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 4130 scores 1,890 and the Moore Threads MTT S70 reaches 1,880 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Moore Threads MTT S70 uses MUSA, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon Pro WX 4130) vs 3,584 (Moore Threads MTT S70). Raw compute: 1.348 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4130) vs 11.47 TFLOPS (Moore Threads MTT S70).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,890 | 1,880 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | MUSA |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 3584+460% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.348 TFLOPS | 11.47 TFLOPS+751% |
| ROPs | 16 | 224+1300% |
| TMUs | 40 | 224+460% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3.5 MB+250% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 4130 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Moore Threads MTT S70 has 512 MB. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4130) vs 3.5 MB (Moore Threads MTT S70) — the Moore Threads MTT S70 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3.5 MB+250% |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 4130) vs MUSA Gen2 (Moore Threads MTT S70). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs MUSA Gen2. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 4130) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Moore Threads MTT S70).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | MUSA Gen2 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | MUSA Gen2 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 4130 draws 50W versus the Moore Threads MTT S70's 220W — a 125.9% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4130) vs 600W (Moore Threads MTT S70). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 8-pin.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-77% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-42% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | — | 285mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 37.8+345% | 8.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 4130 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Moore Threads MTT S70 launched at $345 and now averages $140. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 costs 28.6% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 18.9 (Radeon Pro WX 4130) vs 13.4 (Moore Threads MTT S70) — the Radeon Pro WX 4130 offers 41% better value.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-13% | $345 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-29% | $140 |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.9+41% | 13.4 |
| Codename | Baffin | Chunxiao |
| Release | March 1 2017 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #697 | #694 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro WX 4130 and Moore Threads MTT S70
