GeForce GTX 1650 vs Moore Threads MTT S70
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Moore Threads MTT S70
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Moore Threads MTT S70
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 1650 is significantly newer (2019 vs 0). The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Moore Threads MTT S70 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 318.6% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Moore Threads MTT S70.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1650 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+318.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-318.6%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | MUSA (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $140 for the Moore Threads MTT S70, it costs 46% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 681.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1650 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+681.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($75) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($140) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Moore Threads MTT S70
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Moore Threads MTT S70
The Moore Threads MTT S70 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1600 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Moore Threads MTT S70's 1,880 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 318.6%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Moore Threads MTT S70 uses MUSA, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3,584 (Moore Threads MTT S70). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 11.47 TFLOPS (Moore Threads MTT S70).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+319% | 1,880 |
| Architecture | Turing | MUSA |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 3584+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 11.47 TFLOPS+284% |
| ROPs | 32 | 224+600% |
| TMUs | 56 | 224+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3.5 MB+250% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Moore Threads MTT S70 has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3.5 MB (Moore Threads MTT S70) — the Moore Threads MTT S70 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3.5 MB+250% |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MUSA Gen2 (Moore Threads MTT S70). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs MUSA Gen2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Moore Threads MTT S70).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | MUSA Gen2 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | MUSA Gen2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Moore Threads MTT S70's 220W — a 98.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 600W (Moore Threads MTT S70). Power connectors: None vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 285mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-66% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-50% | 600W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 285mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+1134% | 8.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the Moore Threads MTT S70 launched at $345 and now averages $140. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 46.4% less ($65 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 13.4 (Moore Threads MTT S70) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 682.8% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-57% | $345 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $75-46% | $140 |
| Performance per Dollar | 104.9+683% | 13.4 |
| Codename | TU117 | Chunxiao |
| Release | April 23 2019 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #323 | #694 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 and Moore Threads MTT S70
