
Radeon Pro WX 4130 vs GeForce 9400

Radeon Pro WX 4130
Popular choices:

GeForce 9400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is positioned at rank 186 and the GeForce 9400 is on rank 616, so the Radeon Pro WX 4130 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 4130
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1185.7% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9400.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | GeForce 9400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1185.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1185.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro WX 4130 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon Pro WX 4130 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $100), it costs 85% less, resulting in a 92.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | GeForce 9400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+92.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 4130 and GeForce 9400

Radeon Pro WX 4130
The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,890 points.

GeForce 9400
The GeForce 9400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 147 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro WX 4130 scores 1,890 versus the GeForce 9400's 147 — the Radeon Pro WX 4130 leads by 1185.7%. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce 9400 uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon Pro WX 4130) vs 384 (GeForce 9400). Raw compute: 1.348 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4130) vs 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 9400). Boost clocks: 1053 MHz vs 1176 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | GeForce 9400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,890+1186% | 147 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+67% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.348 TFLOPS+49% | 0.9032 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1053 MHz | 1176 MHz+12% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 192 KB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | GeForce 9400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 4130 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9400 has 512 MB. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | GeForce 9400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4130) vs 10 (GeForce 9400). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | GeForce 9400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0)+20% | 10 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+39% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 4130) vs None (GeForce 9400). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs PureVideo HD (VP2). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 4130) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 9400).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | GeForce 9400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | PureVideo HD (VP2) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 4130 draws 50W versus the GeForce 9400's 33W — a 41% difference. The GeForce 9400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4130) vs 350W (GeForce 9400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | GeForce 9400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 33W-34% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 37.8+740% | 4.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 4130 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the GeForce 9400 launched at $59 and now averages $15. The GeForce 9400 costs 85% less ($85 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 18.9 (Radeon Pro WX 4130) vs 9.8 (GeForce 9400) — the Radeon Pro WX 4130 offers 92.9% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | GeForce 9400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $59-80% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $15-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.9+93% | 9.8 |
| Codename | Baffin | GM108 |
| Release | March 1 2017 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #697 | #847 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















