FX-4130 vs Core m3-7Y32
FX-4130
Core m3-7Y32
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-4130 is positioned at rank 637 and the Core m3-7Y32 is on rank 1090, so the FX-4130 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FX-4130
Performance Per Dollar Core m3-7Y32
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | FX-4130 | Core m3-7Y32 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($25) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm) | ✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | FX-4130 | Core m3-7Y32 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1033%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($25) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FX-4130 and Core m3-7Y32
FX-4130
The FX-4130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 August 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,718 points. Launch price was $112.
Core m3-7Y32
The Core m3-7Y32 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,697 points. Launch price was $281.
Processing Power
The FX-4130 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core m3-7Y32 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the FX-4130 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the FX-4130 versus 3 GHz on the Core m3-7Y32 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the FX-4130 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The FX-4130 uses the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core m3-7Y32 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-4130 scores 2,718 against the Core m3-7Y32's 2,697 — a 0.8% lead for the FX-4130.
| Feature | FX-4130 | Core m3-7Y32 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+30% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+245% | 1.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB+700% | 512 kB |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Zambezi (2011−2012) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 2,718 | 2,697 |
Memory & Platform
The FX-4130 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core m3-7Y32 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | FX-4130 | Core m3-7Y32 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3+ | FCBGA1515 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
Value Analysis
The FX-4130 launched at $100 MSRP, while the Core m3-7Y32 debuted at $281. At current prices ($25 vs $281), the FX-4130 is $256 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-4130 delivers 108.7 pts/$ vs 9.6 pts/$ for the Core m3-7Y32 — making the FX-4130 the 167.6% better value option.
| Feature | FX-4130 | Core m3-7Y32 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-64% | $281 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25-91% | $281 |
| Performance per Dollar | 108.7+1032% | 9.6 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on FX-4130 and Core m3-7Y32
