
Radeon Pro WX 4170 vs Radeon R7 A8-7650K

Radeon Pro WX 4170
Popular choices:

Radeon R7 A8-7650K
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro WX 4170 is positioned at rank #167 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 4170
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 4170 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 279.1% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 A8-7650K.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 4170 | Radeon R7 A8-7650K |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+279.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-279.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro WX 4170 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 4170 and Radeon R7 A8-7650K

Radeon Pro WX 4170
The Radeon Pro WX 4170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,870 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon R7 A8-7650K
The Radeon R7 A8-7650K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 757 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro WX 4170 scores 2,870 versus the Radeon R7 A8-7650K's 757 — the Radeon Pro WX 4170 leads by 279.1%. The Radeon Pro WX 4170 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R7 A8-7650K uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs 384 (Radeon R7 A8-7650K). Raw compute: 2.46 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-7650K). Boost clocks: 1201 MHz vs 825 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4170 | Radeon R7 A8-7650K |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,870+279% | 757 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+167% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.46 TFLOPS+288% | 0.6336 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1201 MHz+46% | 825 MHz |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 64+167% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+167% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4170 | Radeon R7 A8-7650K |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 4170 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A8-7650K has 512 MB. The Radeon Pro WX 4170 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 A8-7650K) — the Radeon Pro WX 4170 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4170 | Radeon R7 A8-7650K |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R7 A8-7650K). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4170 | Radeon R7 A8-7650K |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 A8-7650K). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only),AV1 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R7 A8-7650K).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4170 | Radeon R7 A8-7650K |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only),AV1 (Decode Only) | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 4170 draws 50W versus the Radeon R7 A8-7650K's 30W — a 50% difference. The Radeon R7 A8-7650K is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A8-7650K). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4170 | Radeon R7 A8-7650K |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 30W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 57.4+128% | 25.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 4170 launched at $400 MSRP and currently averages $120, while the Radeon R7 A8-7650K launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon R7 A8-7650K costs 100+% less ($120 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.9 (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs Infinity (Radeon R7 A8-7650K) — the Radeon R7 A8-7650K offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 4170 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4170 | Radeon R7 A8-7650K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $400 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.9 | Infinity |
| Codename | Baffin | Opal |
| Release | November 10 2016 | January 9 2014 |
| Ranking | #526 | #890 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















