G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro WX 4170 vs Radeon R7 260 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro WX 4170 vs Radeon R7 260: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro WX 4170

2016

Why buy it

✅70.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
✅Draws 50W instead of 95W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
267% HIGHER MSRP
$400 MSRPvs$109 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 26.5 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).

Radeon R7 260

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $291 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
✅Delivers 269.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.5 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 4170 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌90% higher power demand at 95W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro WX 4170 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 70.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R7 260 instead at 2,892 vs 2,870, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro WX 4170 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 260 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $291 cheaper on MSRP at $109 vs $400, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 269.8% (26.5 vs 7.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 260 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro WX 4170 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon Pro WX 4170 vs Radeon R7 260 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro WX 4170

The Radeon Pro WX 4170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,870 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon R7 260

The Radeon R7 260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 17 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1100 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,892 points. Launch price was $109.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro WX 4170 scores 2,870 and the Radeon R7 260 reaches 2,892 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 4170 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R7 260 uses GCN 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs 768 (Radeon R7 260). Raw compute: 2.46 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 260). Boost clocks: 1201 MHz vs 1100 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4170	Radeon R7 260
G3D Mark Score	2,870	2,892
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1024+33%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.46 TFLOPS+60%	1.536 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1201 MHz+9%	1100 MHz
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	64+33%	48
L1 Cache	256 KB+33%	192 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4170	Radeon R7 260
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro WX 4170 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 260 carries 1 GB. Radeon Pro WX 4170 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 4170 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 260. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 260) — the Radeon Pro WX 4170 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4170	Radeon R7 260
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+300%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R7 260). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4170	Radeon R7 260
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 260). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only),AV1 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC (Radeon R7 260).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4170	Radeon R7 260
Encoder	VCE 3.4 (Polaris)	VCE 2.0
Decoder	UVD 6.3	UVD 4.2
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only),AV1 (Decode Only)	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 4170 draws 50W versus the Radeon R7 260's 95W — a 62.1% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4170 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs 400W (Radeon R7 260). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4170	Radeon R7 260
TDP	50W-47%	95W
Recommended PSU	350W-13%	400W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	—	170mm
Height	—	112mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	80
Perf/Watt	57.4+89%	30.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro WX 4170 came in at $400, while the Radeon R7 260 launched at $109. On MSRP, Radeon R7 260 was 72.8% cheaper ($291 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.2 (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs 26.5 (Radeon R7 260) — the Radeon R7 260 offers 268.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 4170 (2016 vs 2013).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4170	Radeon R7 260
MSRP	$400	$109-73%
Performance per Dollar	7.2	26.5+268%
Codename	Baffin	Bonaire
Release	November 10 2016	December 17 2013
Ranking	#526	#591

Search Radeon Pro WX 4170 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 260 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.