FX-4300 vs Pentium G4560T

FX-4300 vs Pentium G4560T Performance Spectrum

FX-4300

4 / 4

2,995

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Ryzen AI Max 390

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium G4560T

2 / 4

2,994

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-4300 vs Pentium G4560T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-4300 vs Pentium G4560T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-4300

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.5 vs 46.8 PassMark/$ ($122 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.

Pentium G4560T

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $58 less on MSRP ($64 MSRP vs $122 MSRP).
✅Delivers 90.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 46.8 vs 24.5 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $122 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-4300 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,994 vs 2,995).

Quick Answers

So, is FX-4300 better than Pentium G4560T?

Yes. FX-4300 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-4300 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-4300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-4300 is still the much better call for a fresh build. FX-4300 comes in 90.6% more expensive on MSRP at $122 MSRP versus $64 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium G4560T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2017 platform. Even with 90.6% better value on paper (46.8 vs 24.5 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium G4560T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

FX-4300 vs Pentium G4560T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-4300

The FX-4300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,995 points. Launch price was $122.

Pentium G4560T

The Pentium G4560T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133/2400, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,994 points. Launch price was $64.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-4300 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium G4560T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the FX-4300 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the FX-4300 versus 2.9 GHz on the Pentium G4560T — a 31.9% clock advantage for the FX-4300 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The FX-4300 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium G4560T uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-4300 scores 2,995 against the Pentium G4560T's 2,994 — a 0% lead for the FX-4300.

Feature	FX-4300	Pentium G4560T
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4 GHz+38%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+31%	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256K (per core)
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Vishera (2012−2015)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	2,995	2,994

🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-4300 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G4560T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	FX-4300	Pentium G4560T
Socket	AM3+	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FX-4300 was priced at $122, while the Pentium G4560T came in at $64. On launch pricing ($122 vs $64), Pentium G4560T was $58 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-4300 delivers 24.5 pts/$ vs 46.8 pts/$ for the Pentium G4560T — making the Pentium G4560T the 62.3% better value option.

Feature	FX-4300	Pentium G4560T
MSRP	$122	$64-48%
Performance per Dollar	24.5	46.8+91%
Release Date	2012	2017

Search FX-4300 on Amazon

Search Pentium G4560T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.