
FX-4300

Ryzen 7 7800X3D
FX-4300 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
FX-4300 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
FX-4300 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
FX-4300
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $327 less on MSRP ($122 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 120W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,995 vs 34,293).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.5 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($122 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM3+, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +295.3% higher average FPS across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 211.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 24.5 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $122 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of AM3+ and older memory support.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while FX-4300 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌268% HIGHER MSRP$449 MSRPvs$122 MSRP
- ❌26.3% higher power demand at 120W vs 95W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7800X3D better than FX-4300?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
FX-4300 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-4300
The FX-4300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,995 points. Launch price was $122.


Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The FX-4300 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the FX-4300 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D (base: 3.8 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The FX-4300 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the FX-4300 scores 2,995 against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 34,293 — a 167.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
| Feature | FX-4300 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 5 GHz+25% |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz | 4.4 GHz+16% |
| L3 Cache | — | 96 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB+300% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 5 nm-84% |
| Architecture | Vishera (2012−2015) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 2,995 | 34,293+1045% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 15,000 |
Memory & Platform
The FX-4300 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | FX-4300 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3+ | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 5.0+150% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 28 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (FX-4300) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). The Ryzen 7 7800X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the FX-4300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | FX-4300 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FX-4300 was priced at $122, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D came in at $449. On launch pricing ($122 vs $449), FX-4300 was $327 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-4300 delivers 24.5 pts/$ vs 76.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — making the Ryzen 7 7800X3D the 102.7% better value option.
| Feature | FX-4300 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $122-73% | $449 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.5 | 76.4+212% |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














