FX-4350 vs Core i7-875K
FX-4350
Core i7-875K
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-4350 is positioned at rank 660 and the Core i7-875K is on rank 1012, so the FX-4350 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FX-4350
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-875K
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | FX-4350 | Core i7-875K |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($140) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($175) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Vishera (2012−2015) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Lynnfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | FX-4350 | Core i7-875K |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+25%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($140) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($175) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FX-4350 and Core i7-875K
FX-4350
The FX-4350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,184 points. Launch price was $69.
Core i7-875K
The Core i7-875K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,177 points. Launch price was $486.
Processing Power
The FX-4350 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-875K's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the FX-4350 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-875K — a 17.7% clock advantage for the FX-4350 (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.93 GHz). The FX-4350 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-875K uses Lynnfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the FX-4350 scores 3,184 against the Core i7-875K's 3,177 — a 0.2% lead for the FX-4350.
| Feature | FX-4350 | Core i7-875K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+19% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+43% | 2.93 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB+1500% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Vishera (2012−2015) | Lynnfield (2009−2010) |
| PassMark | 3,184 | 3,177 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 504 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,289 | — |
Memory & Platform
The FX-4350 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-875K uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1866 memory speed. The FX-4350 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | FX-4350 | Core i7-875K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3+ | LGA1156 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866 | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+100% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (FX-4350) vs VT-x (Core i7-875K). Primary use case: FX-4350 targets Gaming, Core i7-875K targets Desktop.
| Feature | FX-4350 | Core i7-875K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x |
| Target Use | Gaming | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The FX-4350 launched at $122 MSRP, while the Core i7-875K debuted at $353. At current prices ($140 vs $175), the FX-4350 is $35 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-4350 delivers 22.7 pts/$ vs 18.2 pts/$ for the Core i7-875K — making the FX-4350 the 22.4% better value option.
| Feature | FX-4350 | Core i7-875K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $122-65% | $353 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $140-20% | $175 |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.7+25% | 18.2 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on FX-4350 and Core i7-875K
