Radeon HD 4350 vs Quadro FX 770M
Radeon HD 4350
Popular choices:
Quadro FX 770M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 4350 is positioned at rank 239 and the Quadro FX 770M is on rank 284, so the Radeon HD 4350 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4350
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 770M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 770M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 29.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 4350 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 4350 | Quadro FX 770M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-29.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+29.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 770M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 4350 and Quadro FX 770M
Radeon HD 4350
The Radeon HD 4350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 165 points. Launch price was $199.
Quadro FX 770M
The Quadro FX 770M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 213 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 4350 scores 165 versus the Quadro FX 770M's 213 — the Quadro FX 770M leads by 29.1%. The Radeon HD 4350 is built on TeraScale while the Quadro FX 770M uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 4350) vs 240 (Quadro FX 770M). Raw compute: 1 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4350) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 770M).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4350 | Quadro FX 770M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 165 | 213+29% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+233% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1 TFLOPS+61% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 80+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 4350 | Quadro FX 770M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 4350 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 770M has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 4350 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4350 | Quadro FX 770M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 4350 draws 110W versus the Quadro FX 770M's 189W — a 52.8% difference. The Radeon HD 4350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 4350) vs 350W (Quadro FX 770M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4350 | Quadro FX 770M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W-42% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 72°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.5+36% | 1.1 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 4350 and Quadro FX 770M
