Radeon HD 4350 vs GeForce 9200
Radeon HD 4350
Popular choices:
GeForce 9200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 4350 is positioned at rank 239 and the GeForce 9200 is on rank 562, so the Radeon HD 4350 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4350
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 9200 is significantly newer (2016 vs 2008). The GeForce 9200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 4350 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 9200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 4350 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 4350 | GeForce 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 4350 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 4350 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $15), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 47.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 4350 | GeForce 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+47.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 4350 and GeForce 9200
Radeon HD 4350
The Radeon HD 4350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 165 points. Launch price was $199.
GeForce 9200
The GeForce 9200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 168 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 4350 scores 165 and the GeForce 9200 reaches 168 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4350 is built on TeraScale while the GeForce 9200 uses Maxwell, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 4350) vs 256 (GeForce 9200). Raw compute: 1 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4350) vs 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 9200).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4350 | GeForce 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 165 | 168+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+213% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1 TFLOPS+97% | 0.5084 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+25% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 4350 | GeForce 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 4350 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9200 has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 4350 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 4350) vs 1 MB (GeForce 9200) — the GeForce 9200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4350 | GeForce 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Radeon HD 4350) vs 10.0 (GeForce 9200). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4350 | GeForce 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs PureVideo HD (VP2). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 4350) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 9200).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4350 | GeForce 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | None |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | PureVideo HD (VP2) |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 4350 draws 110W versus the GeForce 9200's 16W — a 149.2% difference. The GeForce 9200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 4350) vs 350W (GeForce 9200). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 72°C vs 70.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4350 | GeForce 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W | 16W-85% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 72°C | 70-3% |
| Perf/Watt | 1.5 | 10.5+600% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 4350 launched at $35 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GeForce 9200 launched at $50 and now averages $15. The Radeon HD 4350 costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 16.5 (Radeon HD 4350) vs 11.2 (GeForce 9200) — the Radeon HD 4350 offers 47.3% better value. The GeForce 9200 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4350 | GeForce 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $35-30% | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-33% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.5+47% | 11.2 |
| Codename | RV770 | GM108 |
| Release | June 25 2008 | March 25 2016 |
| Ranking | #876 | #864 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 4350 and GeForce 9200
