Radeon HD 4350 vs Radeon HD 3670
Radeon HD 4350
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 3670
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 4350 is positioned at rank 239 and the Radeon HD 3670 is on rank 320, so the Radeon HD 4350 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4350
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 3670
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 3670 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 4350 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 4350 | Radeon HD 3670 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 4350 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 4350 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $15), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 46.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 4350 | Radeon HD 3670 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+46.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 4350 and Radeon HD 3670
Radeon HD 4350
The Radeon HD 4350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 165 points. Launch price was $199.
Radeon HD 3670
The Radeon HD 3670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 169 points. Launch price was $369.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 4350 scores 165 and the Radeon HD 3670 reaches 169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4350 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon HD 3670 uses TeraScale 3, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 4350) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 3670). Raw compute: 1 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4350) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3670).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4350 | Radeon HD 3670 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 165 | 169+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 1536+92% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1 TFLOPS | 2.703 TFLOPS+170% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 96+140% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 192 KB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 4350 | Radeon HD 3670 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 4350 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 3670 has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 4350 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 4350) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 3670) — the Radeon HD 3670 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4350 | Radeon HD 3670 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Radeon HD 4350) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 3670). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4350 | Radeon HD 3670 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs UVD.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4350 | Radeon HD 3670 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | UVD |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | UVD |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 4350 draws 110W versus the Radeon HD 3670's 250W — a 77.8% difference. The Radeon HD 4350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 4350) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3670). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4350 | Radeon HD 3670 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W-56% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 72°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.5+114% | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 4350 launched at $35 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Radeon HD 3670 launched at $100 and now averages $15. The Radeon HD 4350 costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 16.5 (Radeon HD 4350) vs 11.3 (Radeon HD 3670) — the Radeon HD 4350 offers 46% better value. The Radeon HD 3670 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4350 | Radeon HD 3670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $35-65% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-33% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.5+46% | 11.3 |
| Codename | RV770 | Cayman |
| Release | June 25 2008 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #876 | #596 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 4350 and Radeon HD 3670
