FX-6100
VS
Core i7-7600U

FX-6100 vs Core i7-7600U

AMD

FX-6100

6 Cores6 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core i7-7600U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-6100 is positioned at rank 741 and the Core i7-7600U is on rank 604, so the Core i7-7600U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FX-6100

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
13953%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
13184%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9573%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2884%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2284%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1998%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1145%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1130%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1029%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1028%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1017%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
990%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
976%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
972%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
963%
#288
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
99%
#392
Celeron G4920
MSRP: $52|Avg: $115
99%
#741
FX-6100
MSRP: $165|Avg: $25
100%
#742
Pentium G2020T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $69
100%
#743
Core i7-4771
MSRP: $320|Avg: $78
100%
#746
Core i7-4770S
MSRP: $305|Avg: $35
99%
#747
Core i5-6400T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $40
99%
#749
Core i5-3570K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
99%
#750
Athlon II X3 455
MSRP: $88|Avg: $15
99%
#751
Core i5-3570S
MSRP: $213|Avg: $59
98%
#752
Core i7-3770
MSRP: $294|Avg: $60
98%
#753
Pentium G2120
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
98%
#754
Core i5-3340S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $25
97%
#755
Celeron G1101
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
97%
#756
FX-8150
MSRP: $245|Avg: $50
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-7600U

#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
99%
#592
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
796%
#593
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
784%
#594
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
720%
#595
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
717%
#596
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
710%
#598
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
686%
#599
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
657%
#600
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
656%
#601
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
639%
#604
Core i7-7600U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#608
Ryzen AI 5 330
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i7-7600U (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightFX-6100Core i7-7600U
Gaming
Balanced gaming performance
Balanced gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-6100 (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightFX-6100Core i7-7600U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FX-6100 and Core i7-7600U

AMD

FX-6100

The FX-6100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,686 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i7-7600U

The Core i7-7600U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,687 points. Launch price was $393.

Processing Power

The FX-6100 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Core i7-7600U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the FX-6100 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the FX-6100 versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-7600U — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The FX-6100 uses the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-7600U uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-6100 scores 3,686 against the Core i7-7600U's 3,687 — a 0% lead for the Core i7-7600U. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the FX-6100 vs 4 MB on the Core i7-7600U.

FeatureFX-6100Core i7-7600U
Cores / Threads
6 / 6+200%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Base Clock
3.3 GHz+18%
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+100%
4 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB+1100%
512 kB
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Zambezi (2011−2012)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
3,686
3,687
🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-6100 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-7600U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureFX-6100Core i7-7600U
Socket
AM3+
BGA1356
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%