FX-6100 vs Celeron G6900T
FX-6100
Celeron G6900T
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The FX-6100 is positioned at rank #741 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FX-6100
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G6900T
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | FX-6100 | Celeron G6900T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($25) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm) | ✨ Modern (Alder Lake-S (2022) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | FX-6100 | Celeron G6900T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+101%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($25) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FX-6100 and Celeron G6900T
FX-6100
The FX-6100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,686 points. Launch price was $69.
Celeron G6900T
The Celeron G6900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 3,668 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The FX-6100 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Celeron G6900T offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the FX-6100 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the FX-6100 versus 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G6900T — a 32.8% clock advantage for the FX-6100 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The FX-6100 uses the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron G6900T uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the FX-6100 scores 3,686 against the Celeron G6900T's 3,668 — a 0.5% lead for the FX-6100. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the FX-6100 vs 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900T.
| Feature | FX-6100 | Celeron G6900T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6+200% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+39% | 2.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+18% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+100% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+380% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | Intel 7 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Zambezi (2011−2012) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| PassMark | 3,686 | 3,668 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,400 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 2,450 |
Memory & Platform
The FX-6100 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G6900T uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | FX-6100 | Celeron G6900T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3+ | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 5.0+150% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (FX-6100) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron G6900T). The Celeron G6900T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 710), while the FX-6100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900T rivals Pentium Gold G7400T.
| Feature | FX-6100 | Celeron G6900T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics 710 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Low Power Desktop |
Value Analysis
The FX-6100 launched at $165 MSRP, while the Celeron G6900T debuted at $42. At current prices ($25 vs $50), the FX-6100 is $25 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-6100 delivers 147.4 pts/$ vs 73.4 pts/$ for the Celeron G6900T — making the FX-6100 the 67.1% better value option.
| Feature | FX-6100 | Celeron G6900T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $165 | $42-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25-50% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 147.4+101% | 73.4 |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on FX-6100 and Celeron G6900T
