FX-6120
VS
Core i3-10110U

FX-6120 vs Core i3-10110U

AMD

FX-6120

6 Cores6 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i3-10110U

2 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-6120 is positioned at rank 787 and the Core i3-10110U is on rank 578, so the Core i3-10110U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FX-6120

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
15213%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
14375%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
10437%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3144%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2491%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2179%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1248%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1232%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1121%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1121%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1109%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1079%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1064%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1059%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1050%
#294
Core i9-7920X
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $236
96%
#393
Core i3-9300T
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
100%
#394
Ryzen 3 2200GE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#787
FX-6120
MSRP: $188|Avg: $54
100%
#788
Core i7-6700TE
MSRP: $303|Avg: $175
100%
#790
Athlon II X4 620
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
100%
#791
Core i7-3820
MSRP: $286|Avg: $30
99%
#792
Athlon II X3 425
MSRP: $79|Avg: $5
99%
#793
Athlon II X2 255
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
98%
#794
Core i3-3245
MSRP: $120|Avg: $50
98%
#796
FX-4170
MSRP: $157|Avg: $23
97%
#798
Athlon II X3 415e
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
96%
#799
Core i5-2300
MSRP: $177|Avg: $17
96%
#800
Core i7-4820K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $40
96%
#802
Core i7-3770K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $75
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-10110U

#566
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
764%
#567
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
753%
#568
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
691%
#569
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
688%
#570
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
682%
#572
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
659%
#573
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
631%
#574
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
630%
#575
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
613%
#578
Core i3-10110U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#583
Processor N100
MSRP: $128|Avg: $100
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-10110U (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightFX-6120Core i3-10110U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($54)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-6120 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightFX-6120Core i3-10110U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($54)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FX-6120 and Core i3-10110U

AMD

FX-6120

The FX-6120 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,853 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i3-10110U

The Core i3-10110U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,839 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The FX-6120 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Core i3-10110U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the FX-6120 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the FX-6120 versus 4.1 GHz on the Core i3-10110U — a 2.4% clock advantage for the FX-6120 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The FX-6120 uses the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-10110U uses Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-6120 scores 3,853 against the Core i3-10110U's 3,839 — a 0.4% lead for the FX-6120. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the FX-6120 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-10110U.

FeatureFX-6120Core i3-10110U
Cores / Threads
6 / 6+200%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
4.2 GHz+2%
4.1 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+71%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+100%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
6 MB+2300%
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Zambezi (2011−2012)
Comet Lake-U (2019−2020)
PassMark
3,853
3,839
Cinebench R23 Multi
2,327
Geekbench 6 Single
1,270
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,353
🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-6120 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-10110U uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureFX-6120Core i3-10110U
Socket
AM3+
FCBGA1528
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (FX-6120) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-10110U). The Core i3-10110U includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics for 10th Gen), while the FX-6120 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-10110U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i3-10110U rivals Ryzen 3 3200U.

FeatureFX-6120Core i3-10110U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics for 10th Gen
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Productivity