FX-6120
VS
Atom C3958

FX-6120 vs Atom C3958

AMD

FX-6120

6 Cores6 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Atom C3958

16 Cores16 Thrd31 WWMax: 2 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-6120 is positioned at rank 787 and the Atom C3958 is on rank 902, so the FX-6120 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FX-6120

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
15213%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
14375%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
10437%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3144%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2491%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2179%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1248%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1232%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1121%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1121%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1109%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1079%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1064%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1059%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1050%
#294
Core i9-7920X
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $236
96%
#393
Core i3-9300T
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
100%
#394
Ryzen 3 2200GE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#787
FX-6120
MSRP: $188|Avg: $54
100%
#788
Core i7-6700TE
MSRP: $303|Avg: $175
100%
#790
Athlon II X4 620
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
100%
#791
Core i7-3820
MSRP: $286|Avg: $30
99%
#792
Athlon II X3 425
MSRP: $79|Avg: $5
99%
#793
Athlon II X2 255
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
98%
#794
Core i3-3245
MSRP: $120|Avg: $50
98%
#796
FX-4170
MSRP: $157|Avg: $23
97%
#798
Athlon II X3 415e
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
96%
#799
Core i5-2300
MSRP: $177|Avg: $17
96%
#800
Core i7-4820K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $40
96%
#802
Core i7-3770K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $75
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom C3958

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
23751%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
4484%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
3984%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
3078%
#506
Xeon E5-2680 v3
MSRP: $1745|Avg: $212
97%
#507
Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
MSRP: $5945|Avg: $7000
96%
#508
Xeon E7-8895 v2
MSRP: $6841|Avg: $65
96%
#509
EPYC 9754
MSRP: $11900|Avg: $10631
95%
#509
EPYC 9684X
MSRP: $14756|Avg: $14756
95%
#511
Xeon D-1587
MSRP: $1652|Avg: $1443
94%
#512
Xeon E5-2687W v4
MSRP: $2141|Avg: $1138
94%
#513
Xeon W-3265
MSRP: $3684|Avg: $3400
93%
#514
Xeon E5-2658A V3
MSRP: $1832|Avg: $200
93%
#515
Xeon E5-4640 v4
MSRP: $2837|Avg: N/A
91%
#902
Atom C3958
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#906
Xeon E5405
MSRP: $209|Avg: $15
96%
#907
Xeon E5-2440
MSRP: $728|Avg: $249
96%
#916
Xeon E5-2650L
MSRP: $748|Avg: $129
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom C3958 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4: 2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightFX-6120Atom C3958
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($54)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-6120 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightFX-6120Atom C3958
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($54)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FX-6120 and Atom C3958

AMD

FX-6120

The FX-6120 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,853 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Atom C3958

The Atom C3958 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,929 points. Launch price was $449.

Processing Power

The FX-6120 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Atom C3958 offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Atom C3958 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the FX-6120 versus 2 GHz on the Atom C3958 — a 71% clock advantage for the FX-6120 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The FX-6120 uses the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Atom C3958 uses Goldmont (2016−2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-6120 scores 3,853 against the Atom C3958's 3,929 — a 2% lead for the Atom C3958. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the FX-6120 vs 16 MB on the Atom C3958.

FeatureFX-6120Atom C3958
Cores / Threads
6 / 6
16 / 16+167%
Boost Clock
4.2 GHz+110%
2 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+80%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
16 MB+100%
L2 Cache
6 MB
16 MB+167%
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Zambezi (2011−2012)
Goldmont (2016−2017)
PassMark
3,853
3,929+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-6120 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom C3958 uses FCBGA1310 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureFX-6120Atom C3958
Socket
AM3+
FCBGA1310
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12