Core i5-13600K
VS
Atom C3958

Core i5-13600K vs Atom C3958

Intel

Core i5-13600K

14 Cores20 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2022
VS
Intel

Atom C3958

16 Cores16 Thrd31 WWMax: 2 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13600K

#120
Ryzen 5 5600XT
MSRP: $192|Avg: $180
105%
#121
Core i5-13600
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
105%
#122
Core i3-13100F
MSRP: $109|Avg: $119
104%
#123
Ryzen 5 5600G
MSRP: $259|Avg: $160
104%
#124
Core Ultra 9 285K
MSRP: $589|Avg: $550
104%
#125
Core i5-13400E
MSRP: $221|Avg: $221
103%
#126
Ryzen 7 8700F
MSRP: $270|Avg: $257
103%
#127
Core i9-14900KF
MSRP: $564|Avg: $480
103%
#128
Core i7-12700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $285
102%
#129
Core i9-13900KF
MSRP: $599|Avg: $480
102%
#130
Core i7-12700
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
102%
#131
Core Ultra 5 245T
MSRP: $270|Avg: $270
102%
#132
Core i5-8500
MSRP: $192|Avg: $80
101%
#133
Core i5-9400F
MSRP: $182|Avg: $80
100%
#134
Core i5-11400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $141
100%
#135
Core i5-13600K
MSRP: $329|Avg: $319
100%
#136
Core i5-13500
MSRP: $242|Avg: $264
100%
#137
Ryzen 7 8700G
MSRP: $329|Avg: $269
100%
#138
Core i7-14700
MSRP: $384|Avg: $348
100%
#139
Ryzen 5 2500X
MSRP: $159|Avg: $80
99%
#140
Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $60
99%
#141
Core i9-13900K
MSRP: $599|Avg: $500
99%
#142
Core i3-14100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $131
98%
#143
Ryzen 5 3400G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
97%
#144
Core i7-10700KF
MSRP: $405|Avg: $160
97%
#145
Core i5-11600K
MSRP: $262|Avg: $170
97%
#146
Core i7-13700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $400
97%
#147
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
96%
#148
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $150
96%
#149
Core i9-12900KS
MSRP: $739|Avg: $385
96%
#150
Ryzen 5 5500X3D
MSRP: $185|Avg: $180
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom C3958

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
23751%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
4484%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
3984%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
3078%
#506
Xeon E5-2680 v3
MSRP: $1745|Avg: $212
97%
#507
Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
MSRP: $5945|Avg: $7000
96%
#508
Xeon E7-8895 v2
MSRP: $6841|Avg: $65
96%
#509
EPYC 9754
MSRP: $11900|Avg: $10631
95%
#509
EPYC 9684X
MSRP: $14756|Avg: $14756
95%
#511
Xeon D-1587
MSRP: $1652|Avg: $1443
94%
#512
Xeon E5-2687W v4
MSRP: $2141|Avg: $1138
94%
#513
Xeon W-3265
MSRP: $3684|Avg: $3400
93%
#514
Xeon E5-2658A V3
MSRP: $1832|Avg: $200
93%
#515
Xeon E5-4640 v4
MSRP: $2837|Avg: N/A
91%
#902
Atom C3958
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#906
Xeon E5405
MSRP: $209|Avg: $15
96%
#907
Xeon E5-2440
MSRP: $728|Avg: $249
96%
#916
Xeon E5-2650L
MSRP: $748|Avg: $129
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i5-13600K delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Atom C3958 in both compute-intensive tasks (162.2% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i5-13600KAtom C3958
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($319)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) / Intel 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i5-13600KAtom C3958
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($319)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Atom C3958

Intel

Core i5-13600K

The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Intel

Atom C3958

The Atom C3958 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,929 points. Launch price was $449.

Processing Power

The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Atom C3958 offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Atom C3958 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 2 GHz on the Atom C3958 — a 87.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Atom C3958 uses Goldmont (2016−2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Atom C3958's 3,929 — a 162.2% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 16 MB on the Atom C3958.

FeatureCore i5-13600KAtom C3958
Cores / Threads
14 / 20
16 / 16+14%
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+155%
2 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+75%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
24 MB+50%
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
16 MB+700%
Process
Intel 7 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
Goldmont (2016−2017)
PassMark
37,655+858%
3,929
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Atom C3958 uses FCBGA1310 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i5-13600K versus DDR4-2400 on the Atom C3958 — the Core i5-13600K supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3958 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13600K) vs 12 (Atom C3958) — the Core i5-13600K offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and Intel FCBGA1310 (Atom C3958).

FeatureCore i5-13600KAtom C3958
Socket
LGA1700
FCBGA1310
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600+25%
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
256 GB+33%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20+67%
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) / not specified (Atom C3958). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Atom C3958 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop.

FeatureCore i5-13600KAtom C3958
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop