Quadro FX 770M vs Radeon HD 4350
Quadro FX 770M
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 4350
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 770M is positioned at rank 284 and the Radeon HD 4350 is on rank 239, so the Radeon HD 4350 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 770M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4350
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 770M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 29.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 4350 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro FX 770M | Radeon HD 4350 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+29.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-29.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 770M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 770M and Radeon HD 4350
Quadro FX 770M
The Quadro FX 770M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 213 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Radeon HD 4350
The Radeon HD 4350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 165 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 770M scores 213 versus the Radeon HD 4350's 165 — the Quadro FX 770M leads by 29.1%. The Quadro FX 770M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 4350 uses TeraScale, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 770M) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4350). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 770M) vs 1 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4350).
| Feature | Quadro FX 770M | Radeon HD 4350 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 213+29% | 165 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 800+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 1 TFLOPS+61% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 770M | Radeon HD 4350 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 770M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4350 has 1 GB. The Radeon HD 4350 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Quadro FX 770M | Radeon HD 4350 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 770M draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 4350's 110W — a 52.8% difference. The Radeon HD 4350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 770M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4350). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro FX 770M | Radeon HD 4350 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 110W-42% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 72°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.1 | 1.5+36% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 770M and Radeon HD 4350
