FX-8140
VS
Core i5-7442EQ

FX-8140 vs Core i5-7442EQ

AMD

FX-8140

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i5-7442EQ

4 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-8140 is positioned at rank 759 and the Core i5-7442EQ is on rank 807, so the FX-8140 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FX-8140

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
14431%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
13636%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9901%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2983%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2363%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2067%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1184%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1168%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1064%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1064%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1052%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1023%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1009%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1005%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
996%
#291
Core i9-7900X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $188
97%
#759
FX-8140
MSRP: $225|Avg: $120
100%
#760
Athlon X2 450
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
100%
#761
Athlon II X3 450
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
99%
#762
Core i7-4790
MSRP: $339|Avg: $60
99%
#763
Pentium G640
MSRP: $64|Avg: $5
99%
#764
Pentium G840
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
99%
#765
Core i5-6440EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
99%
#767
Core i5-4590T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $130
98%
#769
Celeron G530T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $17
98%
#770
Core i7-4770K
MSRP: $339|Avg: $100
97%
#771
A10-9700
MSRP: $169|Avg: $40
97%
#772
Core i5-2400
MSRP: $184|Avg: $25
97%
#773
Core i7-5775C
MSRP: $366|Avg: $150
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-7442EQ

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16118%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15230%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11058%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3331%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2639%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2308%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1322%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1305%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1188%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1188%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1175%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1143%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1127%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1122%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1112%
#805
Pentium G620
MSRP: $64|Avg: $12
100%
#806
Pentium G645T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
100%
#807
Core i5-7442EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
100%
#810
Core i3-3250T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
99%
#811
Core i5-5575R
MSRP: $265|Avg: $50
99%
#813
Core i3-3210
MSRP: $117|Avg: $25
99%
#814
Celeron G3900E
MSRP: $107|Avg: $35
98%
#815
Athlon II X3 435
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
98%
#816
Core i7-6822EQ
MSRP: $294|Avg: $190
98%
#817
Athlon II X4 645
MSRP: $126|Avg: $20
97%
#818
Core i5-7400
MSRP: $294|Avg: $70
96%
#819
Pentium E5800
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
96%
#820
Core i7-6820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $344
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-7442EQ (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3L-1600, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightFX-8140Core i5-7442EQ
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($120)
More affordable ($50)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-8140 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightFX-8140Core i5-7442EQ
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+139%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($120)
More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FX-8140 and Core i5-7442EQ

AMD

FX-8140

The FX-8140 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,860 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i5-7442EQ

The Core i5-7442EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,834 points. Launch price was $250.

Processing Power

The FX-8140 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i5-7442EQ offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-8140 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the FX-8140 versus 2.1 GHz on the Core i5-7442EQ — a 64.5% clock advantage for the FX-8140. The FX-8140 uses the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-7442EQ uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8140 scores 4,860 against the Core i5-7442EQ's 4,834 — a 0.5% lead for the FX-8140. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the FX-8140 vs 6 MB on the Core i5-7442EQ.

FeatureFX-8140Core i5-7442EQ
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+100%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
4.1 GHz+95%
2.1 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+33%
6 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB+700%
1 MB
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Zambezi (2011−2012)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
4,860
4,834
Geekbench 6 Single
728
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,387
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (FX-8140) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7442EQ). The Core i5-7442EQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the FX-8140 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7442EQ targets Embedded.

FeatureFX-8140Core i5-7442EQ
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Embedded
💰

Value Analysis

The FX-8140 launched at $225 MSRP, while the Core i5-7442EQ debuted at $250. At current prices ($120 vs $50), the Core i5-7442EQ is $70 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-8140 delivers 40.5 pts/$ vs 96.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-7442EQ — making the Core i5-7442EQ the 81.9% better value option.

FeatureFX-8140Core i5-7442EQ
MSRP
$225-10%
$250
Avg Price (30d)
$120
$50-58%
Performance per Dollar
40.5
96.7+139%
Release Date
2012
2017