FX-8140
VS
Xeon E5645

FX-8140 vs Xeon E5645

AMD

FX-8140

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Xeon E5645

6 Cores12 Thrd80 WWMax: 2.67 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-8140 is positioned at rank 759 and the Xeon E5645 is on rank 669, so the Xeon E5645 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FX-8140

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
14431%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
13636%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9901%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2983%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2363%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2067%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1184%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1168%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1064%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1064%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1052%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1023%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1009%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1005%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
996%
#291
Core i9-7900X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $188
97%
#759
FX-8140
MSRP: $225|Avg: $120
100%
#760
Athlon X2 450
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
100%
#761
Athlon II X3 450
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
99%
#762
Core i7-4790
MSRP: $339|Avg: $60
99%
#763
Pentium G640
MSRP: $64|Avg: $5
99%
#764
Pentium G840
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
99%
#765
Core i5-6440EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
99%
#767
Core i5-4590T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $130
98%
#769
Celeron G530T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $17
98%
#770
Core i7-4770K
MSRP: $339|Avg: $100
97%
#771
A10-9700
MSRP: $169|Avg: $40
97%
#772
Core i5-2400
MSRP: $184|Avg: $25
97%
#773
Core i7-5775C
MSRP: $366|Avg: $150
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5645

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
12363%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2334%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2074%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1602%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $1000
100%
#396
Xeon Platinum 8461V
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
99%
#397
Xeon W-3235
MSRP: $1538|Avg: $1538
99%
#398
Xeon w9-3595X
MSRP: $5889|Avg: $6000
99%
#399
Xeon W-3365
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499
97%
#669
Xeon E5645
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
100%
#670
Xeon X5672
MSRP: $300|Avg: $44
100%
#671
Xeon E5-4603
MSRP: $202|Avg: $80
100%
#674
Xeon E3-1265L v4
MSRP: $417|Avg: $80
99%
#677
Xeon E5-1607 v2
MSRP: $250|Avg: $68
99%
#678
Xeon W5590
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
98%
#683
Xeon E5-1603 v3
MSRP: $273|Avg: $40
97%
#684
Xeon E3-1270
MSRP: $330|Avg: $178
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($294) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5645 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightFX-8140Xeon E5645
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($120)
⚠️ Higher cost ($294)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-8140 ($120), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($174 less, 59% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightFX-8140Xeon E5645
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+141%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($120)
⚠️ Higher cost ($294)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FX-8140 and Xeon E5645

AMD

FX-8140

The FX-8140 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,860 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Xeon E5645

The Xeon E5645 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,942 points. Launch price was $294.

Processing Power

The FX-8140 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5645 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the FX-8140 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the FX-8140 versus 2.67 GHz on the Xeon E5645 — a 42.2% clock advantage for the FX-8140 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The FX-8140 uses the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5645 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8140 scores 4,860 against the Xeon E5645's 4,942 — a 1.7% lead for the Xeon E5645. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the FX-8140 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E5645.

FeatureFX-8140Xeon E5645
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+33%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.1 GHz+54%
2.67 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+33%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
12 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
8 MB+3100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Zambezi (2011−2012)
Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark
4,860
4,942+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-8140 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5645 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureFX-8140Xeon E5645
Socket
AM3+
LGA1366
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 5.0+150%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
288 GB
RAM Channels
3
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (FX-8140) / VT-x (Xeon E5645). Primary use case: Xeon E5645 targets Server.

FeatureFX-8140Xeon E5645
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Server
💰

Value Analysis

The FX-8140 launched at $225 MSRP, while the Xeon E5645 debuted at $294.

FeatureFX-8140Xeon E5645
MSRP
$225-23%
$294
Avg Price (30d)
$120
Release Date
2012
2010