FX-8140 vs Xeon X7460

FX-8140 vs Xeon X7460 Performance Spectrum

FX-8140

8 / 8

4,860

+1.2%

FX-4130

FX-7500

Athlon X4 845

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon X7460

6 / 6

4,803

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-8140 vs Xeon X7460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-8140 vs Xeon X7460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-8140

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 95W instead of 130W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $225 MSRP, while Xeon X7460 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon X7460

2008

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-8140 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,803 vs 4,860).
❌36.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 95W.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-8140 better than Xeon X7460?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X7460 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while FX-8140 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-8140 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 15.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-8140 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-8140 is the better buy right now. FX-8140 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $225 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 15.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (21.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

FX-8140 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/6. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

FX-8140 vs Xeon X7460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-8140

The FX-8140 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,860 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon X7460

The Xeon X7460 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 September 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Dunnington (2008) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 0.67 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per module). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,803 points. Launch price was $2,729.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-8140 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon X7460 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the FX-8140 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the FX-8140 versus 0.67 GHz on the Xeon X7460 — a 143.8% clock advantage for the FX-8140 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The FX-8140 uses the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon X7460 uses Dunnington (2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8140 scores 4,860 against the Xeon X7460's 4,803 — a 1.2% lead for the FX-8140. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the FX-8140 vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon X7460.

Feature	FX-8140	Xeon X7460
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+33%	6 / 6
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+512%	0.67 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+20%	2.66 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	16 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	8 MB+167%	3 MB (per module)
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Zambezi (2011−2012)	Dunnington (2008)
PassMark	4,860+1%	4,803

🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-8140 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X7460 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	FX-8140	Xeon X7460
Socket	AM3+	PGA604
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR2-667
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (FX-8140) / VT-x (Xeon X7460). Primary use case: Xeon X7460 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon X7460 rivals Core i7-980X.