FX-8150 vs Pentium Silver N6005

FX-8150 vs Pentium Silver N6005 Performance Spectrum

FX-8150

8 / 8

5,318

+1.2%

Athlon Silver 3050U

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Pentium Silver N6005

4 / 4

5,253

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-8150 vs Pentium Silver N6005 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-8150 vs Pentium Silver N6005: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-8150

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +33.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $245 MSRP, while Pentium Silver N6005 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1150% higher power demand at 125W vs 10W.

Pentium Silver N6005

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 10W instead of 125W, a 115W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-8150 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,253 vs 5,318).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is FX-8150 better than Pentium Silver N6005?

Yes. FX-8150 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 33.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-8150 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 33.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-8150 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-8150 is the better buy right now. FX-8150 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $245 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 33.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (21.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium Silver N6005 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

FX-8150 vs Pentium Silver N6005 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-8150

The FX-8150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,318 points. Launch price was $149.

Pentium Silver N6005

The Pentium Silver N6005 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,253 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-8150 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Pentium Silver N6005 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-8150 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the FX-8150 versus 3.3 GHz on the Pentium Silver N6005 — a 24% clock advantage for the FX-8150 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The FX-8150 uses the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium Silver N6005 uses Jasper Lake (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8150 scores 5,318 against the Pentium Silver N6005's 5,253 — a 1.2% lead for the FX-8150. L3 cache: 8192 kB on the FX-8150 vs 4 MB (total) on the Pentium Silver N6005.

Feature	FX-8150	Pentium Silver N6005
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 4
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+27%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+80%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	8192 kB+100%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	8192 kB+433%	1.5 MB (total)
Process	32 nm	10 nm-69%
Architecture	Zambezi (2011−2012)	Jasper Lake (2021)
PassMark	5,318+1%	5,253

🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-8150 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium Silver N6005 uses BGA1338 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.