FX-8150 vs Xeon E3-1245

FX-8150 vs Xeon E3-1245 Performance Spectrum

FX-8150

8 / 8

5,318

0.0%

Athlon Silver 3050U

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E3-1245

4 / 8

5,346

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-8150 vs Xeon E3-1245 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-8150 vs Xeon E3-1245: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-8150

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,318 vs 5,346).
❌Launch MSRP is still $245 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1245 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌31.6% higher power demand at 125W vs 95W.

Xeon E3-1245

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 95W instead of 125W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-8150 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1245 better than FX-8150?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1245 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while FX-8150 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1245 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3-1245 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon E3-1245 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $245 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. FX-8150 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (21.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3+.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E3-1245 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

FX-8150 vs Xeon E3-1245 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-8150

The FX-8150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,318 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1245

The Xeon E3-1245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,346 points. Launch price was $350.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-8150 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E3-1245 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the FX-8150 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the FX-8150 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E3-1245 — a 12.7% clock advantage for the FX-8150 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The FX-8150 uses the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E3-1245 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8150 scores 5,318 against the Xeon E3-1245's 5,346 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E3-1245. L3 cache: 8192 kB on the FX-8150 vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1245.

Feature	FX-8150	Xeon E3-1245
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+14%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+9%	3.3 GHz
L3 Cache	8192 kB	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	8192 kB+3100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Zambezi (2011−2012)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	5,318	5,346

🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-8150 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E3-1245 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.