FX-8300
VS
Core i7-4700MQ

FX-8300 vs Core i7-4700MQ

AMD

FX-8300

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i7-4700MQ

4 Cores8 Thrd47 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-8300 is positioned at rank 639 and the Core i7-4700MQ is on rank 1000, so the FX-8300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FX-8300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11515%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10881%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7900%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2380%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1885%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1649%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
945%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
932%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
849%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
849%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
839%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
817%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
805%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
802%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
795%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#388
Ryzen Embedded R2312
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
#638
Celeron G540T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
100%
#639
FX-8300
MSRP: $197|Avg: $50
100%
#640
Core i5-6600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $90
100%
#641
Core i5-4460
MSRP: $182|Avg: $40
100%
#644
Core i3-4170T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $17
99%
#645
FX-8370E
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
99%
#646
Core i5-4590S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $45
99%
#647
Pentium G2020
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#648
Pentium G3450
MSRP: $82|Avg: $25
98%
#649
Core i7-6700
MSRP: $303|Avg: $143
98%
#650
Athlon II X4 631
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
98%
#651
Pentium G3240T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#652
Core i3-4160T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $18
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4700MQ

#988
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2100%
#989
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2069%
#990
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1900%
#991
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1891%
#992
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1874%
#994
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1810%
#995
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1735%
#996
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1732%
#997
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1686%
#1000
Core i7-4700MQ
MSRP: $383|Avg: $50
100%
#1001
Athlon II M340
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
100%
#1005
Pentium P6000
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
98%
#1007
Core i7-3630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
97%
#1008
Core i7-3610QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
97%
#1009
Core i3-1115GRE
MSRP: $338|Avg: $480
97%
#1010
Pentium A1020
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
97%
#1011
Core i7-4702MQ
MSRP: $383|Avg: $50
97%
#1012
Pentium N4200
MSRP: $161|Avg: $30.89
96%
#1013
Pentium J2900
MSRP: $94|Avg: $20
95%
#1014
Celeron T1700
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
95%
#1015
Celeron T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The FX-8300 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i7-4700MQ is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightFX-8300Core i7-4700MQ
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Vishera (2012−2015) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core i7-4700MQ stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 0% cheaper ($50 vs $50) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightFX-8300Core i7-4700MQ
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+0%)
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FX-8300 and Core i7-4700MQ

AMD

FX-8300

The FX-8300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,333 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i7-4700MQ

The Core i7-4700MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,349 points. Launch price was $288.

Processing Power

The FX-8300 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-4700MQ offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the FX-8300 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the FX-8300 versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-4700MQ — a 21.1% clock advantage for the FX-8300 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The FX-8300 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-4700MQ uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8300 scores 5,333 against the Core i7-4700MQ's 5,349 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-4700MQ.

FeatureFX-8300Core i7-4700MQ
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+100%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.2 GHz+24%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.3 GHz+38%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
8192 kB+3100%
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Vishera (2012−2015)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
5,333
5,349
🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-8300 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-4700MQ uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureFX-8300Core i7-4700MQ
Socket
AM3+
PGA946
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
💰

Value Analysis

The FX-8300 launched at $197 MSRP, while the Core i7-4700MQ debuted at $383. At current prices ($50 vs $50), the Core i7-4700MQ is $0 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-8300 delivers 106.7 pts/$ vs 107.0 pts/$ for the Core i7-4700MQ — making the Core i7-4700MQ the 0.3% better value option.

FeatureFX-8300Core i7-4700MQ
MSRP
$197-49%
$383
Avg Price (30d)
$50
$50
Performance per Dollar
106.7
107.0
Release Date
2012
2013