FX-8320E
VS
Core i5-6440HQ

FX-8320E vs Core i5-6440HQ

AMD

FX-8320E

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Core i5-6440HQ

4 Cores4 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-8320E is positioned at rank 555 and the Core i5-6440HQ is on rank 879, so the FX-8320E offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FX-8320E

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
9239%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
8730%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6338%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1910%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1513%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1323%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
758%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
748%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
681%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
681%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
673%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
655%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
646%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
643%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
638%
#274
Ryzen 7 1800X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
97%
#379
Core i9-9940X
MSRP: $1387|Avg: $850
98%
#380
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1836
97%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
96%
#555
FX-8320E
MSRP: $147|Avg: $60
100%
#556
Pentium G3260
MSRP: $64|Avg: $21
98%
#561
Athlon II X2 220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $10
97%
#563
Athlon X4 840
MSRP: $102|Avg: $25
97%
#564
Athlon 5350
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
97%
#566
FX-8320
MSRP: $169|Avg: $50
96%
#567
FX-8120
MSRP: $205|Avg: $40
95%
#568
Core i3-7100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $39
95%
#569
Pentium E2220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $32
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-6440HQ

#867
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1461%
#868
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1440%
#869
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1322%
#870
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1316%
#871
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1304%
#873
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1259%
#874
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1207%
#875
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1205%
#876
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1173%
#879
Core i5-6440HQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
100%
#882
Celeron Dual-Core T1600
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#884
Athlon II N330
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
100%
#889
Core i7-7820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
98%
#890
Celeron 7305
MSRP: $128|Avg: $107
98%
#891
E-300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
98%
#892
Core i7-7820HK
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The FX-8320E leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i5-6440HQ is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightFX-8320ECore i5-6440HQ
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($60)
⚠️ Higher cost ($250)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Vishera (2012−2015) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the FX-8320E stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 76% cheaper ($60 vs $250) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightFX-8320ECore i5-6440HQ
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+312%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($60)
⚠️ Higher cost ($250)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FX-8320E and Core i5-6440HQ

AMD

FX-8320E

The FX-8320E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,960 points. Launch price was $147.

Intel

Core i5-6440HQ

The Core i5-6440HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,021 points. Launch price was $250.

Processing Power

The FX-8320E packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i5-6440HQ offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-8320E has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the FX-8320E versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-6440HQ — a 13.3% clock advantage for the FX-8320E (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The FX-8320E uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-6440HQ uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8320E scores 4,960 against the Core i5-6440HQ's 5,021 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i5-6440HQ.

FeatureFX-8320ECore i5-6440HQ
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+100%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
4 GHz+14%
3.5 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+23%
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB
L2 Cache
8192 kB+700%
1 MB
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Vishera (2012−2015)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
4,960
5,021+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
439
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,734
🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-8320E uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-6440HQ uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the FX-8320E versus DDR4-2133 on the Core i5-6440HQ — the Core i5-6440HQ supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-6440HQ supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (FX-8320E) vs 16 (Core i5-6440HQ) — the Core i5-6440HQ offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureFX-8320ECore i5-6440HQ
Socket
AM3+
BGA1440
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
DDR4-2133+33%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
64 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the FX-8320E has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (FX-8320E) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-6440HQ). The Core i5-6440HQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 530), while the FX-8320E requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6440HQ targets Mobile.

FeatureFX-8320ECore i5-6440HQ
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 530
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mobile
💰

Value Analysis

The FX-8320E launched at $147 MSRP, while the Core i5-6440HQ debuted at $250.

FeatureFX-8320ECore i5-6440HQ
MSRP
$147-41%
$250
Avg Price (30d)
$60
Release Date
2014
2015