FX-8320E vs Ryzen Embedded V2A46

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-8320E vs Ryzen Embedded V2A46 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-8320E vs Ryzen Embedded V2A46: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-8320E

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Embedded V2A46.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,960 vs 4,999).
❌Launch MSRP is still $147 MSRP, while Ryzen Embedded V2A46 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.

Ryzen Embedded V2A46

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-8320E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike FX-8320E.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded V2A46 better than FX-8320E?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, FX-8320E is ahead with a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded V2A46 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded V2A46 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Embedded V2A46 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Ryzen Embedded V2A46 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $147 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. FX-8320E only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2014 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (33.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3+.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded V2A46 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

FX-8320E vs Ryzen Embedded V2A46 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-8320E

The FX-8320E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,960 points. Launch price was $147.

Ryzen Embedded V2A46

The Ryzen Embedded V2A46 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,999 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-8320E packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the FX-8320E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the FX-8320E versus 3.2 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the FX-8320E (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The FX-8320E uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8320E scores 4,960 against the Ryzen Embedded V2A46's 4,999 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen Embedded V2A46.

Feature	FX-8320E	Ryzen Embedded V2A46
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4 GHz+25%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+7%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	—	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	8192 kB+1500%	512 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	7 nm-78%
Architecture	Vishera (2012−2015)	Renoir (2020−2023)
PassMark	4,960	4,999
Geekbench 6 Single	439	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,734	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-8320E uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	FX-8320E	Ryzen Embedded V2A46
Socket	AM3+	FP6
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (FX-8320E) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded V2A46).

Feature	FX-8320E	Ryzen Embedded V2A46
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FX-8320E was priced at $147, while the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 came in at $0. On launch pricing ($147 vs $0), Ryzen Embedded V2A46 was $147 cheaper.

Feature	FX-8320E	Ryzen Embedded V2A46
MSRP	$147	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	33.7	—
Release Date	2014	2023

Search FX-8320E on Amazon

Search Ryzen Embedded V2A46 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.