FX-8320E vs Xeon D-1520

FX-8320E vs Xeon D-1520 Performance Spectrum

FX-8320E

8 / 8

4,960

+0.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon D-1520

4 / 8

4,917

0.0%

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-8320E vs Xeon D-1520 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-8320E vs Xeon D-1520: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-8320E

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon D-1520.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $147 MSRP, while Xeon D-1520 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.

Xeon D-1520

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-8320E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,917 vs 4,960).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike FX-8320E.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-8320E better than Xeon D-1520?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1520 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while FX-8320E is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-8320E is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-8320E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-8320E is the better buy right now. FX-8320E comes in at an unclear MSRP at $147 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (33.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1520 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

FX-8320E vs Xeon D-1520 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-8320E

The FX-8320E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,960 points. Launch price was $147.

Xeon D-1520

The Xeon D-1520 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (per core). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1667. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,917 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-8320E packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon D-1520 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the FX-8320E has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the FX-8320E versus 2.6 GHz on the Xeon D-1520 — a 42.4% clock advantage for the FX-8320E (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The FX-8320E uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon D-1520 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8320E scores 4,960 against the Xeon D-1520's 4,917 — a 0.9% lead for the FX-8320E.

Feature	FX-8320E	Xeon D-1520
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4 GHz+54%	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+45%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	1.5 MB (per core)
L2 Cache	8192 kB+3100%	256K (per core)
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Vishera (2012−2015)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	4,960	4,917
Geekbench 6 Single	439	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,734	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-8320E uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon D-1520 uses FCBGA1667 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.