
FX-8370E

Ryzen 5 3600
FX-8370E vs Ryzen 5 3600 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
FX-8370E vs Ryzen 5 3600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
FX-8370E vs Ryzen 5 3600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
FX-8370E
2014Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,878 vs 1,898).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 26.8 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +74.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 232.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 26.8 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than FX-8370E?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
FX-8370E vs Ryzen 5 3600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-8370E
The FX-8370E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,324 points. Launch price was $199.


Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.
Processing Power
The FX-8370E packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the FX-8370E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the FX-8370E versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 2.4% clock advantage for the FX-8370E (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The FX-8370E uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8370E scores 5,324 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 107.4% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 512 vs 1,295, a 86.7% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,878 vs 1,898 (1.1% advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600).
| Feature | FX-8370E | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+2% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.6 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | — | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 8192 kB+1500% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Vishera (2012−2015) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 5,324 | 17,685+232% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 9,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 512 | 1,295+153% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,878 | 1,898+1% |
Memory & Platform
The FX-8370E uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the FX-8370E versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 — the Ryzen 5 3600 supports 71.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 3600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (FX-8370E) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) — the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 990FX,AMD 970 (FX-8370E) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).
| Feature | FX-8370E | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3+ | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866 | DDR4-3200+71% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 128 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 24 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (FX-8370E) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | FX-8370E | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | Yes |
| Target Use | — | Gaming/Budget Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FX-8370E was priced at $199, while the Ryzen 5 3600 came in at $199. On launch pricing ($199 vs $199), Ryzen 5 3600 was $0 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-8370E delivers 26.8 pts/$ vs 88.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3600 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 107.4% better value option.
| Feature | FX-8370E | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.8 | 88.9+232% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














