
FX-9590

Ryzen 7 7800X3D
FX-9590 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
FX-9590 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Warzone
FX-9590 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
FX-9590
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 30 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,194 vs 34,293).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.1 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($350 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌83.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 120W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM3+, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +78.3% higher average FPS across 30 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 162.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 29.1 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 220W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of AM3+ and older memory support.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌28.3% HIGHER MSRP$449 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7800X3D better than FX-9590?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
FX-9590 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-9590
The FX-9590 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 July 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 220 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 10,194 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The FX-9590 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the FX-9590 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — identical boost frequencies (base: 4.7 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The FX-9590 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the FX-9590 scores 10,194 against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 34,293 — a 108.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
| Feature | FX-9590 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.7 GHz+7% | 4.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 96 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 8192 kB+700% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 5 nm-84% |
| Architecture | Vishera (2012−2015) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 10,194 | 34,293+236% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 15,000 |
Memory & Platform
The FX-9590 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | FX-9590 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3+ | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 5.0+150% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 28 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (FX-9590) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). The Ryzen 7 7800X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the FX-9590 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | FX-9590 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FX-9590 was priced at $350, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D came in at $449. On launch pricing ($350 vs $449), FX-9590 was $99 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-9590 delivers 29.1 pts/$ vs 76.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — making the Ryzen 7 7800X3D the 89.6% better value option.
| Feature | FX-9590 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350-22% | $449 |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.1 | 76.4+163% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














