
FX-9590 vs Xeon E-2324G

FX-9590

Xeon E-2324G
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-9590 is positioned at rank 608 and the Xeon E-2324G is on rank 351, so the Xeon E-2324G offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FX-9590
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E-2324G
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | FX-9590 | Xeon E-2324G |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($100) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Vishera (2012−2015) / 32 nm) | ✨ Modern (Rocket Lake-E (2021) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | FX-9590 | Xeon E-2324G |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($100) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FX-9590 and Xeon E-2324G

FX-9590
The FX-9590 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 July 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 220 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 10,194 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E-2324G
The Xeon E-2324G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 10,339 points. Launch price was $209.
Processing Power
The FX-9590 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E-2324G offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-9590 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the FX-9590 versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon E-2324G — a 8.3% clock advantage for the FX-9590 (base: 4.7 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The FX-9590 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E-2324G uses Rocket Lake-E (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-9590 scores 10,194 against the Xeon E-2324G's 10,339 — a 1.4% lead for the Xeon E-2324G.
| Feature | FX-9590 | Xeon E-2324G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+100% | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+9% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.7 GHz+52% | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 8192 kB+1500% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Vishera (2012−2015) | Rocket Lake-E (2021) |
| PassMark | 10,194 | 10,339+1% |
Memory & Platform
The FX-9590 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E-2324G uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | FX-9590 | Xeon E-2324G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3+ | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













