FX-9800P
VS
Core i7-4610Y

FX-9800P vs Core i7-4610Y

AMD

FX-9800P

4 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Core i7-4610Y

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-9800P is positioned at rank 949 and the Core i7-4610Y is on rank 458, so the Core i7-4610Y offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FX-9800P

#937
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1789%
#938
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1763%
#939
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1618%
#940
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1611%
#941
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1596%
#943
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1541%
#944
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1478%
#945
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1476%
#946
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1436%
#949
FX-9800P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
100%
#951
Celeron 1020E
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
100%
#954
Core i7-5850EQ
MSRP: $435|Avg: $370
99%
#956
Core i7-4810MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
98%
#959
Celeron Dual-Core T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
97%
#960
Celeron 4305UE
MSRP: $107|Avg: $107
97%
#963
Core i7-10510U
MSRP: $409|Avg: N/A
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4610Y

#144
Core i7-12650H
MSRP: $457|Avg: N/A
97%
#446
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
600%
#447
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
591%
#448
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
543%
#449
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
540%
#450
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
535%
#452
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
517%
#453
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
496%
#454
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
495%
#455
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
481%
#458
Core i7-4610Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#472
Ryzen Embedded R1505G
MSRP: $80|Avg: $80
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The FX-9800P delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i7-4610Y in both compute-intensive tasks (0.6% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightFX-9800PCore i7-4610Y
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($45)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightFX-9800PCore i7-4610Y
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($45)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FX-9800P and Core i7-4610Y

AMD

FX-9800P

The FX-9800P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per module). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,460 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i7-4610Y

The Core i7-4610Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,446 points. Launch price was $415.

Processing Power

The FX-9800P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-4610Y offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the FX-9800P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the FX-9800P versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i7-4610Y — a 21.5% clock advantage for the FX-9800P (base: 2.7 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The FX-9800P uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i7-4610Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the FX-9800P scores 2,460 against the Core i7-4610Y's 2,446 — a 0.6% lead for the FX-9800P.

FeatureFX-9800PCore i7-4610Y
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz+24%
2.9 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz+59%
1.7 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per module)+100%
512 kB
Process
28 nm
22 nm-21%
Architecture
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
2,460
2,446
Geekbench 6 Single
700
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,350
🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-9800P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4610Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureFX-9800PCore i7-4610Y
Socket
FP4
FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (FX-9800P) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-4610Y). The Core i7-4610Y includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4200), while the FX-9800P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4610Y targets Ultrabook/Tablet.

FeatureFX-9800PCore i7-4610Y
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4200
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Ultrabook/Tablet