FX-9800P vs Xeon D-1602

FX-9800P vs Xeon D-1602 Performance Spectrum

FX-9800P

4 / 4

2,460

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon D-1602

2 / 4

2,459

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-9800P vs Xeon D-1602 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-9800P vs Xeon D-1602: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-9800P

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 15W instead of 27W, a 12W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Xeon D-1602 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon D-1602

2019

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-9800P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,459 vs 2,460).
❌80% higher power demand at 27W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-9800P better than Xeon D-1602?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1602 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while FX-9800P is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-9800P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-9800P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-9800P is the better buy right now. FX-9800P comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (16.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1602 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

FX-9800P vs Xeon D-1602 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-9800P

The FX-9800P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per module). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,460 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon D-1602

The Xeon D-1602 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1667. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,459 points. Launch price was $106.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-9800P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon D-1602 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the FX-9800P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the FX-9800P versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon D-1602 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the FX-9800P (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The FX-9800P uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon D-1602 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-9800P scores 2,460 against the Xeon D-1602's 2,459 — a 0% lead for the FX-9800P.

Feature	FX-9800P	Xeon D-1602
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+12%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+8%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per module)+100%	512 kB
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	2,460	2,459

🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-9800P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1602 uses FCBGA1667 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.