Core i7-4500U vs FX-9800P

Intel

Core i7-4500U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3 GHz2013

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

FX-9800P

4 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2016

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-4500U

2013

Why buy it

  • +1.2% higher PassMark.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4400, while FX-9800P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-9800P across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 16.4 PassMark/$ ($398 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 3313.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 15W.

FX-9800P

2016

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +10.1% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $248 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $398 MSRP).
  • Delivers 162.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 6.3 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $398 MSRP).
  • Draws 15W instead of 512W, a 497W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,460 vs 2,490).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4500U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-9800P better than Core i7-4500U?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, FX-9800P is ahead with a 10.1% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4500U pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4500U is the better fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
FX-9800P is the smarter buy today. FX-9800P is $248 cheaper on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $398 MSRP, and it gives you a 10.1% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Core i7-4500U is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.2% better PassMark. It is also 162.1% better value on MSRP (16.4 vs 6.3 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
FX-9800P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i7-4500UFX-9800P
1080p
low62 FPS62 FPS
medium62 FPS62 FPS
high62 FPS62 FPS
ultra62 FPS62 FPS
1440p
low62 FPS62 FPS
medium62 FPS62 FPS
high62 FPS62 FPS
ultra62 FPS62 FPS
4K
low62 FPS62 FPS
medium57 FPS56 FPS
high44 FPS44 FPS
ultra34 FPS35 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i7-4500UFX-9800P
1080p
low62 FPS62 FPS
medium62 FPS62 FPS
high61 FPS62 FPS
ultra45 FPS62 FPS
1440p
low61 FPS62 FPS
medium53 FPS62 FPS
high50 FPS62 FPS
ultra39 FPS62 FPS
4K
low43 FPS62 FPS
medium39 FPS62 FPS
high28 FPS62 FPS
ultra20 FPS53 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i7-4500UFX-9800P
1080p
low62 FPS62 FPS
medium62 FPS62 FPS
high62 FPS62 FPS
ultra62 FPS62 FPS
1440p
low62 FPS62 FPS
medium62 FPS62 FPS
high62 FPS62 FPS
ultra62 FPS62 FPS
4K
low62 FPS62 FPS
medium62 FPS62 FPS
high62 FPS62 FPS
ultra62 FPS62 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i7-4500UFX-9800P
1080p
low62 FPS62 FPS
medium62 FPS62 FPS
high62 FPS62 FPS
ultra62 FPS62 FPS
1440p
low62 FPS62 FPS
medium62 FPS62 FPS
high62 FPS62 FPS
ultra62 FPS62 FPS
4K
low62 FPS62 FPS
medium62 FPS62 FPS
high62 FPS62 FPS
ultra62 FPS62 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-4500U and FX-9800P

Intel

Core i7-4500U

The Core i7-4500U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-ULT (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,490 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

FX-9800P

The FX-9800P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per module). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,460 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i7-4500U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-9800P offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-9800P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i7-4500U versus 3.6 GHz on the FX-9800P — a 18.2% clock advantage for the FX-9800P (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i7-4500U uses the Haswell-ULT (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the FX-9800P uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4500U scores 2,490 against the FX-9800P's 2,460 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i7-4500U.

FeatureCore i7-4500UFX-9800P
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3 GHz
3.6 GHz+20%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
2.7 GHz+50%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
1 MB (per module)+300%
Process
22 nm-21%
28 nm
Architecture
Haswell-ULT (2013)
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark
2,490+1%
2,460
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4500U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-9800P uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-4500UFX-9800P
Socket
FCBGA1168
FP4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
1600
Max RAM Capacity
16
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-4500U) / not specified (FX-9800P). The Core i7-4500U includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4400), while the FX-9800P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4500U targets Mobile.

FeatureCore i7-4500UFX-9800P
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4400
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
Target Use
Mobile
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-4500U launched at $398 MSRP, while the FX-9800P debuted at $150. On MSRP ($398 vs $150), the FX-9800P is $248 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4500U delivers 6.3 pts/$ vs 16.4 pts/$ for the FX-9800P — making the FX-9800P the 89.5% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-4500UFX-9800P
MSRP
$398
$150-62%
Performance per Dollar
6.3
16.4+160%
Release Date
2013
2016