
Core i7-4500U
Popular choices:

FX-9800P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-4500U
2013Why buy it
- ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4400, while FX-9800P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-9800P across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 16.4 PassMark/$ ($398 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌3313.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 15W.
FX-9800P
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.1% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $248 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $398 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 162.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 6.3 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $398 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 512W, a 497W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,460 vs 2,490).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4500U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-4500U
2013FX-9800P
2016Why buy it
- ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4400, while FX-9800P needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.1% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $248 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $398 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 162.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 6.3 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $398 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 512W, a 497W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-9800P across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 16.4 PassMark/$ ($398 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌3313.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,460 vs 2,490).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4500U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is FX-9800P better than Core i7-4500U?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-4500U | FX-9800P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-4500U | FX-9800P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 53 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-4500U | FX-9800P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-4500U | FX-9800P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-4500U and FX-9800P

Core i7-4500U
Core i7-4500U
The Core i7-4500U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-ULT (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,490 points. Launch price was $69.

FX-9800P
FX-9800P
The FX-9800P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per module). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,460 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i7-4500U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-9800P offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-9800P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i7-4500U versus 3.6 GHz on the FX-9800P — a 18.2% clock advantage for the FX-9800P (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i7-4500U uses the Haswell-ULT (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the FX-9800P uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4500U scores 2,490 against the FX-9800P's 2,460 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i7-4500U.
| Feature | Core i7-4500U | FX-9800P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 3.6 GHz+20% |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2.7 GHz+50% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB (per module)+300% |
| Process | 22 nm-21% | 28 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell-ULT (2013) | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 2,490+1% | 2,460 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-4500U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-9800P uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-4500U | FX-9800P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1168 | FP4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Core i7-4500U) / not specified (FX-9800P). The Core i7-4500U includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4400), while the FX-9800P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4500U targets Mobile.
| Feature | Core i7-4500U | FX-9800P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 4400 | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
| Target Use | Mobile | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-4500U launched at $398 MSRP, while the FX-9800P debuted at $150. On MSRP ($398 vs $150), the FX-9800P is $248 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4500U delivers 6.3 pts/$ vs 16.4 pts/$ for the FX-9800P — making the FX-9800P the 89.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-4500U | FX-9800P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $398 | $150-62% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.3 | 16.4+160% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2016 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













