Core i7-4500U vs FX-9800P

Core i7-4500U vs FX-9800P Performance Spectrum

Core i7-4500U

2 / 4

2,490

+1.2%

2,460

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4500U vs FX-9800P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4500U vs FX-9800P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4500U

2013

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4400, while FX-9800P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 16.4 PassMark/$ ($398 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌3313.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 15W.

FX-9800P

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $248 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $398 MSRP).
✅Delivers 162.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 6.3 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $398 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 512W, a 497W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,460 vs 2,490).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4500U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-9800P better than Core i7-4500U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, FX-9800P is ahead with a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4500U pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4500U is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-9800P is the better buy right now. FX-9800P comes in $248 cheaper on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $398 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i7-4500U is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.2% better PassMark. It is also 162.1% better value on MSRP (16.4 vs 6.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

FX-9800P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-4500U vs FX-9800P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4500U

The Core i7-4500U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-ULT (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,490 points. Launch price was $69.

FX-9800P

The FX-9800P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per module). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,460 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4500U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-9800P offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-9800P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i7-4500U versus 3.6 GHz on the FX-9800P — a 18.2% clock advantage for the FX-9800P (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i7-4500U uses the Haswell-ULT (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the FX-9800P uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4500U scores 2,490 against the FX-9800P's 2,460 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i7-4500U.

Feature	Core i7-4500U	FX-9800P
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.6 GHz+20%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.7 GHz+50%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB (per module)
Process	22 nm-21%	28 nm
Architecture	Haswell-ULT (2013)	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark	2,490+1%	2,460

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4500U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-9800P uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-4500U	FX-9800P
Socket	FCBGA1168	FP4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-4500U) / not specified (FX-9800P). The Core i7-4500U includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4400), while the FX-9800P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4500U targets Mobile.

Feature	Core i7-4500U	FX-9800P
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 4400	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	true	—
Target Use	Mobile	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-4500U was priced at $398, while the FX-9800P came in at $150. On launch pricing ($398 vs $150), FX-9800P was $248 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4500U delivers 6.3 pts/$ vs 16.4 pts/$ for the FX-9800P — making the FX-9800P the 89.5% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-4500U	FX-9800P
MSRP	$398	$150-62%
Performance per Dollar	6.3	16.4+160%
Release Date	2013	2016

Search Core i7-4500U on Amazon

Search FX-9800P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.