
Core 2 Duo SP9300
Popular choices:

Core i7-4500U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 2 Duo SP9300
2008Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 512W, a 506W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4500U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-4500U
2013Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4400, while Core 2 Duo SP9300 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,490 vs 2,517).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $398 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo SP9300 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌8433.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 6W.
Core 2 Duo SP9300
2008Core i7-4500U
2013Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 512W, a 506W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4400, while Core 2 Duo SP9300 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4500U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,490 vs 2,517).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $398 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo SP9300 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌8433.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 6W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-4500U better than Core 2 Duo SP9300?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 2 Duo SP9300 | Core i7-4500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 2 Duo SP9300 | Core i7-4500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 20 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 2 Duo SP9300 | Core i7-4500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 2 Duo SP9300 | Core i7-4500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo SP9300 and Core i7-4500U

Core 2 Duo SP9300
Core 2 Duo SP9300
The Core 2 Duo SP9300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 2.26 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,517 points. Launch price was $284.

Core i7-4500U
Core i7-4500U
The Core i7-4500U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-ULT (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,490 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Duo SP9300 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-4500U's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.26 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SP9300 versus 3 GHz on the Core i7-4500U — a 28.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-4500U (base: 2.26 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core 2 Duo SP9300 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i7-4500U uses Haswell-ULT (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo SP9300 scores 2,517 against the Core i7-4500U's 2,490 — a 1.1% lead for the Core 2 Duo SP9300. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo SP9300 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-4500U.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo SP9300 | Core i7-4500U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.26 GHz | 3 GHz+33% |
| Base Clock | 2.26 GHz+26% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB L2 Cache+50% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+2300% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 22 nm-51% |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008−2011) | Haswell-ULT (2013) |
| PassMark | 2,517+1% | 2,490 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo SP9300 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i7-4500U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo SP9300 versus 1600 on the Core i7-4500U — the Core i7-4500U supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-4500U supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Core 2 Duo SP9300) vs 12 (Core i7-4500U) — the Core i7-4500U offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GS45 (Core 2 Duo SP9300) and Haswell-U (Core i7-4500U).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo SP9300 | Core i7-4500U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA956 | FCBGA1168 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | 1600+53233% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB+52428700% | 16 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 12 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Duo SP9300) vs true (Core i7-4500U). The Core i7-4500U includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4400), while the Core 2 Duo SP9300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4500U targets Mobile.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo SP9300 | Core i7-4500U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics 4400 |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | true |
| Target Use | — | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












