A10-9620P vs Core 2 Duo SP9300

A10-9620P vs Core 2 Duo SP9300 Performance Spectrum

A10-9620P

4 / 4

2,514

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core 2 Duo SP9300

2 / 2

2,517

+0.1%

Pentium Dual Core SU4100

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-9620P vs Core 2 Duo SP9300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-9620P vs Core 2 Duo SP9300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-9620P

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 6W, a 4W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R5, while Core 2 Duo SP9300 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,514 vs 2,517).

Core 2 Duo SP9300

2008

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-9620P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌200% higher power demand at 6W vs 2W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-9620P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-9620P better than Core 2 Duo SP9300?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10-9620P is ahead with a 4.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo SP9300 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo SP9300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-9620P still makes the most sense overall. A10-9620P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-9620P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-9620P vs Core 2 Duo SP9300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-9620P

The A10-9620P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,514 points. Launch price was $130.

Core 2 Duo SP9300

The Core 2 Duo SP9300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 2.26 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,517 points. Launch price was $284.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-9620P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo SP9300 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-9620P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the A10-9620P versus 2.26 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SP9300 — a 40.3% clock advantage for the A10-9620P (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.26 GHz). The A10-9620P uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Duo SP9300 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-9620P scores 2,514 against the Core 2 Duo SP9300's 2,517 — a 0.1% lead for the Core 2 Duo SP9300.

Feature	A10-9620P	Core 2 Duo SP9300
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+50%	2.26 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+11%	2.26 GHz
L3 Cache	—	6 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	2 MB	6 MB+200%
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	2,514	2,517
Geekbench 6 Single	485	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-9620P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo SP9300 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-1866 on the A10-9620P versus DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo SP9300 — the A10-9620P supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-9620P supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A10-9620P) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo SP9300) — the A10-9620P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A10-9620P	Core 2 Duo SP9300
Socket	FP4	BGA956
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-1866+75%	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+700%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-9620P) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo SP9300). The A10-9620P includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5), while the Core 2 Duo SP9300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-9620P targets Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-9620P rivals Core i3-7100U.