A10-9620P vs Celeron 7305
A10-9620P
Celeron 7305
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-9620P is positioned at rank 537 and the Celeron 7305 is on rank 890, so the A10-9620P offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A10-9620P
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 7305
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A10-9620P | Celeron 7305 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($107) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm) | ✨ Modern (Alder Lake-U (2022) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A10-9620P | Celeron 7305 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($107) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10-9620P and Celeron 7305
A10-9620P
The A10-9620P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,514 points. Launch price was $130.
Celeron 7305
The Celeron 7305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture. It features 5 cores and 5 threads. Max frequency: 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 2,520 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The A10-9620P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron 7305 offers 5 cores / 5 threads — the Celeron 7305 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the A10-9620P versus 1.1 GHz on the Celeron 7305 — a 102.2% clock advantage for the A10-9620P. The A10-9620P uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron 7305 uses Alder Lake-U (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the A10-9620P scores 2,514 against the Celeron 7305's 2,520 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron 7305. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 485 vs 641, a 27.7% lead for the Celeron 7305 that directly translates to higher frame rates.
| Feature | A10-9620P | Celeron 7305 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 5 / 5+25% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz+209% | 1.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | — | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+60% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm | Intel 7 nm-75% |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Alder Lake-U (2022) |
| PassMark | 2,514 | 2,520 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 1,422 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 485 | 641+32% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,598 |
Memory & Platform
The A10-9620P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron 7305 uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-1866 on the A10-9620P versus DDR5-4800 on the Celeron 7305 — the Celeron 7305 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A10-9620P) vs 20 (Celeron 7305) — the Celeron 7305 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | A10-9620P | Celeron 7305 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP4 | FCBGA1744 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-1866 | DDR5-4800+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 20+150% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-9620P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 7305). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R5 (A10-9620P) and UHD Graphics for 12th Gen (Celeron 7305) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-9620P targets Laptop, Celeron 7305 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-9620P rivals Core i3-7100U; Celeron 7305 rivals Ryzen 3 7320U.
| Feature | A10-9620P | Celeron 7305 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R5 | UHD Graphics for 12th Gen |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Laptop | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A10-9620P and Celeron 7305
