A10-9620P vs Celeron 7305

A10-9620P vs Celeron 7305 Performance Spectrum

A10-9620P

4 / 4

2,514

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron 7305

5 / 5

2,520

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-9620P vs Celeron 7305 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-9620P vs Celeron 7305: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-9620P

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 15W, a 13W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (485 vs 641).
❌Lower PassMark (2,514 vs 2,520).
❌Older platform position on FP4 with DDR4, while Celeron 7305 moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Celeron 7305

2022

Why buy it

✅+32.2% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of FP4 and DDR4.
✅150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $128 MSRP, while A10-9620P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌650% higher power demand at 15W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 7305 better than A10-9620P?

Yes. Celeron 7305 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 7305 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 7305 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 5 cores and 5 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 7305 is the better buy right now. Celeron 7305 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $128 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (19.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 7305 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of FP4, and more multi-core headroom with 5 cores / 5 threads instead of 4/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

A10-9620P vs Celeron 7305 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-9620P

The A10-9620P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,514 points. Launch price was $130.

Celeron 7305

The Celeron 7305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture. It features 5 cores and 5 threads. Max frequency: 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 2,520 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-9620P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron 7305 offers 5 cores / 5 threads — the Celeron 7305 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the A10-9620P versus 1.1 GHz on the Celeron 7305 — a 102.2% clock advantage for the A10-9620P. The A10-9620P uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron 7305 uses Alder Lake-U (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the A10-9620P scores 2,514 against the Celeron 7305's 2,520 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron 7305. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 485 vs 641, a 27.7% lead for the Celeron 7305 that directly translates to higher frame rates.

Feature	A10-9620P	Celeron 7305
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	5 / 5+25%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+209%	1.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	—
L3 Cache	—	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB+60%	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	28 nm	Intel 7 nm-75%
Architecture	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Alder Lake-U (2022)
PassMark	2,514	2,520
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	1,422
Geekbench 6 Single	485	641+32%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,598

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-9620P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron 7305 uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-1866 on the A10-9620P versus DDR5-4800 on the Celeron 7305 — the Celeron 7305 supports 157.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A10-9620P) vs 20 (Celeron 7305) — the Celeron 7305 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A10-9620P	Celeron 7305
Socket	FP4	FCBGA1744
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-1866	DDR5-4800+157%
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	20+150%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-9620P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 7305). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R5 (A10-9620P) and UHD Graphics for 12th Gen (Celeron 7305) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-9620P targets Laptop, Celeron 7305 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-9620P rivals Core i3-7100U; Celeron 7305 rivals Ryzen 3 7320U.